xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Eirik Rønning" <larsei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Batik and memory consumption
Date Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:45:39 GMT
no wonder why we have issues with 10 approximately 8mb files on one pdf page
then..;)

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Jeremias Maerki <dev@jeremias-maerki.ch>wrote:

> Of course, base64 requires more memory. The whole file is encoded in the
> URL and due to the encoding the file uses even more bytes (roughly 1.25
> times) than the raw original file. The whole URL is stored as a single
> java.lang.String in memory and gets passed around. base64 is nice for
> smaller files that can be embedded. It doesn't make much sense for
> larger images IMO.
>
> On 13.11.2008 21:32:39 Lars Eirik Rønning wrote:
> > ok, thanks.Does embedding base64 require more memory than if referencing
> > only a file path?
> > Thanks , we are in the middle of a project and utilize fop a lot.. It
> great!
> <snip/>
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message