xmlgraphics-batik-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan White <a...@whitemail.net>
Subject [resolved] Re: Correct Method to handle split package org.w3c.dom
Date Tue, 20 Nov 2018 20:12:32 GMT
Latest Batik-all jar still has org.w3c. entries. Pulled in individual jars needed and problem
solved. 

Thanks
Alan 

> On 20 Nov 2018, at 11:18, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1984@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Report the issue in jira with replication steps.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan White <alan@whitemail.net> 
> Sent: 20 November 2018 07:20
> To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org; batik-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org; batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Correct Method to handle split package org.w3c.dom
> 
> Folks
> 
> Going round in circles with Java 9+ module system. Trying to find a way to resolve that
batik-ext and java.xml both contain the package org.w3c.dom. I’m struggling to resolve how
to do this in eclipse. I’ve tried everything I’ve come across and managed to get very
confused.
> 
> How has anyone else resolved this issue please when migrating app that depend on batik
to java 9+? 
> 
> Many thanks
> Alan
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message