xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard C. Dunn <richard.d...@arkona.com>
Subject Re: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary tool s propose
Date Wed, 01 May 2002 14:21:24 GMT
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 09:08 pm, you wrote:
> I would agree with the last statement about a high performance commercial
> all Java FO->PDF.  However, there is really no need.  Would anybody be
> interested in working on FOP with payment leaving the licensing as is?
> This way everybody can benefit.  Anybody with experience interested?
> Patrick Lanphier

Count me in.

Rich Dunn
Arkona, Inc.

View raw message