xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter B. West" <pbw...@powerup.com.au>
Subject Re: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary tool s propose
Date Wed, 01 May 2002 05:49:30 GMT

If I read you right, I think the answer to that would be a resounding 
cry of "Yes" all round. You will certainly get one from me. What did you 
have in mind?


Patrick Lanphier wrote:

>I would agree with the last statement about a high performance commercial
>all Java FO->PDF.  However, there is really no need.  Would anybody be
>interested in working on FOP with payment leaving the licensing as is?
>This way everybody can benefit.  Anybody with experience interested?

View raw message