xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keen Tim" <Tim.K...@nrm.qld.gov.au>
Subject RE: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary tools propose
Date Wed, 01 May 2002 05:53:11 GMT
That's a big yes from me as well.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:pbwest@powerup.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 May 2002 15:50
> To: fop-user@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why is FO(P) a superior model than what most proprietary
> tools propose
> Patrick,
> If I read you right, I think the answer to that would be a resounding 
> cry of "Yes" all round. You will certainly get one from me. 
> What did you 
> have in mind?
> Peter
> Patrick Lanphier wrote:
> >I would agree with the last statement about a high 
> performance commercial
> >all Java FO->PDF.  However, there is really no need.  Would 
> anybody be
> >interested in working on FOP with payment leaving the 
> licensing as is?
> >This way everybody can benefit.  Anybody with experience interested?
> >
> >  
> >

The information in this e-mail together with any attachments is
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.

Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution
and/or publication of this e-mail message is prohibited.  

If you have received this message in error, you are asked to
inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this message
and any copies of this message from your computer and/or your
computer system network.  

View raw message