xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gunnar Liljas" <gun...@leon.se>
Subject Re: FOP.NET
Date Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:37:53 GMT
> > Would a .NET port be worthwhile? Very much so.
>
> Is there a reason the .NET app can't communicate with FOP
> over a network connection ? Why is a port needed ?
>

It's not needed, but it would be nice to be able to make homogeneous
solutions, and there may be a significant performance gain using a native
bindning.

> > They just might do that, and while they're at it, they'll probably
launch an
> > alternative to PDF...
>
> Not enough money in it relative to the anti-trust headache
>

Probably true.

> > PS. Currently I'm using FOP from .NET using a Web Service wrapper, which
> > works just fine, although there is some overhead in this solution. DS
>
> But it works and resource use will go down soon.
>
Good news!

/G


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message