xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremias Maerki <...@jeremias-maerki.ch>
Subject Re: fop 0.91beta vs 0.20.5
Date Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:27:14 GMT
Interesting. It's caused by the "title" element under the page-sequence.
If you comment it, the problem goes away. I will have to take a closer
look to find out what's going on.

On 06.02.2006 12:53:30 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I just gave a try at 0.91beta and I get a null pointer exception:
> 
> E:\soft\apache\fop-0.91beta>.\fop.bat -fo offerta.xml -pdf offerta.pdf
> Exception
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> 
> The very same file, can be parsed successfully with 0.20.5
> 
> E:\soft\apache\fop-0.20.5>.\fop.bat -fo ..\fop-0.91beta\offerta.xml -pdf 
> offerta.pdf
> [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
> [INFO] FOP 0.20.5
> [INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
> [INFO] building formatting object tree
> [INFO] setting up fonts
> [INFO] [1]
> [INFO] [2]
> [INFO] [3]
> [INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer
> 
> The source FO document used is available at:
> http://robi.nunnari.net/offerta.xml
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> Best regards.
> --
> Robi
> 
> 
> Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> > Thank you Jeremias.
> > 
> > I'll do some testing and if all seams right I'll try to deploy
> > 0.91beta to the production environment.
> > After some time of usage, I'll report the result (user satisfaction
> > related to the switch from 0.20.5) of its introduction to the
> > production environment.
> > 
> > Best regards.
> > -- 
> > Robi
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > 
> >> In my opinion, FOP 0.91beta can be used in production if you test it
> >> very thouroughly for the particular documents you need it for. There are
> >> still some features missing that FOP 0.91beta makes not universally
> >> usable, yet. At least at the moment, it's still not a complete
> >> replacement for FOP 0.20.5 althought we're very close now.
> >>
> >> At any rate, we'd love to hear any success stories about the latest
> >> release. :-)
> >>
> >> On 06.02.2006 10:51:34 Roberto Nunnari wrote:
> >>
> >>> I was trying to align the content of a table cell on the
> >>> bottom using vertical-align="bottom", but I found out that
> >>> it is not supported in 0.20.5 but it is in 0.91beta, together
> >>> with many other features.
> >>>
> >>> So, I'm thinking about moving to 0.91beta, but as I remember
> >>> that some time ago I read somewhere that 0.91beta is not
> >>> adviced for production environment, I'd like to ask whether
> >>> now things have changed and if it is now safer to use
> >>> 0.91beta in production environment.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jeremias Maerki


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message