xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manuel Strehl <manuel.str...@physik.uni-regensburg.de>
Subject Re: File sizes under Win and Linux
Date Fri, 04 May 2007 18:51:48 GMT
Ok, updating JRE to 1.6 fixes that. Files are now identical. Thanks!

Manuel


Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Ok, I see. It's the color profile again. FOP seems to have embedded the
> overly big Sun sRGB color profile. This is weird since I've added code
> that should explicitely use the much smaller profile that comes with FOP
> (as happens in your Linux case). At least on my Windows machines, this
> works perfectly. What I see, however, is that you use an ancient JRE on
> Windows. Can you please check if the same problem appears with the
> latest JRE 1.5 or 6?
>
> On 03.05.2007 21:26:03 Manuel Strehl wrote:
>   
>> I can't figure out, where the problem lies. I append a very simple FO 
>> file to this mail. These settings are made:
>>
>> * FOP 0.93
>> * JRE 1.5.0_01 (Win), JRE 1.5.0_07 (Lin)
>> * Win XP, Linux Deb Sarge
>> * No config file used, hence no special fonts embedded
>> * No internal fancy stuff like inline SVG and so on
>>
>> Results: I uploaded them to my webspace:
>>
>> * <http://www.manuel-strehl.de/fop/testcase4-win.pdf> (filesize 105 kB)
>> * <http://www.manuel-strehl.de/fop/testcase4-lin.pdf> (filesize 5 kB)
>>
>> differing in filesize by 2100% ;-) Opening them in Acrobat gives the 
>> exactly same result, including embedded fonts (only Helvetica).
>>
>> You'll find a ready made diff file there as well:
>>
>> * <http://www.manuel-strehl.de/fop/testcase.diff> (filesize 108 kB)
>>
>> but since some stuff is binary, the file looks rather weird.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Manuel
>>
>> PS: The FO file I used to produce above files:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
>>
>>     <fo:layout-master-set>
>>         <fo:simple-page-master
>>                     margin-top="0cm" margin-bottom="0cm"
>>                     margin-left="0cm" margin-right="0cm"
>>                     page-width="21cm" page-height="29.7cm"
>>                     master-name="A4">
>>             <fo:region-body
>>                     margin-bottom="0cm" margin-top="0cm"/>
>>         </fo:simple-page-master>
>>     </fo:layout-master-set>
>>    
>>     <fo:page-sequence master-reference="A4">
>>        
>>         <fo:title>Testcase file sizes</fo:title>
>>
>>         <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
>>            
>>             <fo:block margin-top="14.1mm" font-size="4.9mm" 
>> letter-spacing="1.6" text-align="center">
>>                 F<fo:inline font-size="80%">ile</fo:inline> S<fo:inline

>> font-size="80%">izes</fo:inline>
>>             </fo:block>
>>            
>>             <fo:block-container position="absolute" top="56mm" left="41mm"
>>                                                     >
>>                 <fo:block-container position="absolute" top="0mm">
>>                     <fo:block>1</fo:block>
>>                 </fo:block-container>
>>                 <fo:block-container position="absolute" top="58mm">
>>                     <fo:block>2</fo:block>
>>                 </fo:block-container>
>>                 <fo:block-container position="absolute" top="121mm">
>>                     <fo:block>3</fo:block>
>>                 </fo:block-container>
>>                 <fo:block-container position="absolute" top="173mm">
>>                     <fo:block>4</fo:block>
>>                 </fo:block-container>
>>             </fo:block-container>
>>            
>>         </fo:flow>
>>
>>     </fo:page-sequence>
>>
>> </fo:root>
>>
>>
>> Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
>>     
>>> How about doing a diff between the two PDFs to get an idea what's going
>>> on?
>>>
>>> I wouldn't normally expect any size difference between platforms for a
>>> PDF file if all the variables concerning FOP (especially the
>>> configuration) are the same.
>>>
>>> On 25.04.2007 08:53:57 Manuel Strehl wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> Just a point I noticed last night: Has someone experienced, too, that
>>>> PDF file sizes with Fop 0.93 under *Windows* are approx. 70% larger than
>>>> the ones of FOP 0.93 under *Linux*? It's in both cases the same JRE version.
>>>>
>>>> Was this just a quaint FO file I had, or is this a general result? Btw:
>>>> I had inline SVG (in both cases handled by Batik 1.6), two PNGs and 3
>>>> TTF fonts to be embedded. Could the SVG be the reason?
>>>>
>>>> Best
>>>> Manuel
>>>>     
>>>>         
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message