xmlgraphics-fop-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Helmut Denk <helmut.d...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: is it save to use 'svn-trunk' for docbook2pdf-generation ?
Date Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:21:24 GMT

very helpful. thank you.


cbowditch wrote:
> 
> Helmut Denk wrote:
> 
>> hi fop-community,
>> 
>> i am quite new to fop and wanted to know, in 
>> what state of quality 'trunk' is ...
> 
> The quality of trunk is good thanks to a large automated test suite and 
> per review.
> 
>>  
>> is it save, to use 'fop built from the svn-trunk'
>> to process standard docbook -> fo -> pdf chain ?
>> (using saxon9 for xslt)
> 
> I believe so. I use FOP trunk in my application with no adverse affects.
> 
>> 
>> what are the main differences between 0.95
>> and trunk ? 
> 
> Changes between v0.95 and trunk are listed here:
> 
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/changes.html#version_FOP%20Trunk
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/is-it-save-to-use-%27svn-trunk%27-for-docbook2pdf-generation---tp22200793p22384328.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org


Mime
View raw message