ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-9887) 400-node cluster: Hosts page become unresponsive
Date Tue, 03 Mar 2015 12:57:04 GMT


Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-9887:

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results:
Console output:

This message is automatically generated.

> 400-node cluster: Hosts page become unresponsive
> ------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: AMBARI-9887
>                 URL:
>             Project: Ambari
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ambari-web
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Andrii Tkach
>            Assignee: Andrii Tkach
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>         Attachments: AMBARI-9887.patch
> Hosts page after several minutes become unresponsive.
> With each update execution time growing.
> 50-hosts shown:
> {code}
> Hosts: hosts load: 1266.216ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 2246.903ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 3333.058ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 4550.920ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 6118.454ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 9240.486ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 8515.464ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 8469.037ms
> Hosts: hosts load: 10820.864ms
> {code}

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message