aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Aries release
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:39:28 GMT
I've never seen a deprecated interface subsequently become undeprecated.

Maybe we could mark the version 1.0-RC1?

Just an idea.


On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:59 AM, David Jencks wrote:

> I'd love to see a release of aries-blueprint in particular.  I  
> wonder if it would be a good idea to mark "deprecated" some of the  
> interfaces such as NamespaceHandler that aren't yet in a spec and  
> might change but will be used by lots of people?  On the other hand  
> geronimo-blueprint got released without such markings.
> thanks
> david jencks
> On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do a
>> release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should  
>> give
>> it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the
>> Incubator.
>> Then there is the question of whether to independently version the
>> high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we should
>> keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that.
>> What does everyone think?
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremy

View raw message