aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alasdair Nottingham <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: {DISCUSS] Home for Daytrader sample leveraging Aries
Date Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:28:52 GMT
+1

2010/1/12 Joe Bohn <joebohn@gmail.com>:
> Jeremy,
>
> That is a good point and one of my concerns as well.  There will be fixes
> that will apply to both code streams and some that apply to just one or the
> other.   Even with everything in one Apache project it would be a
> maintenance issue - but admittedly one that might be a little more difficult
> to forget about.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a good solution for that concern yet apart from
> trying to be diligent.  It may be that as both Aries and Geronimo continue
> to evolve it might make sense to merge both versions back into a common
> repository.  However, at this point in time and for the near future, it
> seems best to me that this branch of the code reside in Aries while the pure
> JavaEE branch resides in Geronimo.
>
> Joe
>
> Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe, this sounds good and I think Aries is a good place for this.
>> You mention that the code has diverged from the JEE version. Do you
>> expect DayTrader/Aries to start life on its own or for there to be
>> some way of trying to keep the two projects in sync w.r.t bugs fixed,
>> function added? Perhaps that's just a discussion to have once
>> DayTrader/Aries can be run on Geronimo.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremy
>>
>> 2010/1/11 Joe Bohn <joebohn@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Greetings all,
>>>
>>> I've been working on a version of the Geronimo Daytrader performance
>>> benchmark to leverage the enterprise OSGi application programming model.
>>>  I've been doing this work in my sandbox under Apache Geronimo
>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/jbohn with the most
>>> recent changes under daytrader-bp-new).
>>>
>>> I'd like to find a more permanent location for this work and get it out
>>> of
>>> my sandbox.
>>>
>>> Here is a brief description of what I have thus far in sandbox:
>>> - A restructured Daytrader to support an enterprise OSGi application
>>> programming model including blueprint, web container, jndi, jpa, etc...
>>> - To further support this programming model I have also reorganized the
>>> classes, packages, and bundles.
>>> - Simplification and removal of content not yet available in the
>>> enterprise
>>> OSGi application programming model such as EJB support and removal of
>>> Geronimo specific artifacts such as the plugins.
>>> - Refactoring the way components gain knowledge of each other and
>>> interact
>>> to support blueprint concepts such as reference list and reference
>>> listeners.
>>> - Support for just two different persistence mechanisms - direct JDBC and
>>> direct JPA which are currently included in the enterprise OSGi
>>> application
>>> programming model.
>>> - packaging using the Aries Application concepts.
>>>
>>> After seeing the recently introduced Apache Aries Blog Sample and its
>>> assembly for Equinox it encouraged me to do something similar for
>>> Daytrader
>>> so that I could get this running with Apache Aries.  I now have a further
>>> subset of my sandbox work that could be added as a peer to the
>>> blog-sample
>>> which includes just the JDBC persistence mechanism, is hard-wired to
>>> Derby,
>>> and includes an Equinox assembly to run it. This is not currently in any
>>> svn
>>> because I did it on my local repository under aries/trunk/samples with
>>> hopes
>>> of checking it in there.
>>>
>>> I think it is time to get this code to a better home and I'm currently
>>> thinking that aries/trunk/samples is a good place to start.  For now I
>>> would
>>> check in just the version with JDBC and the equinox assembly. However, I
>>> would extend this with other capabilities already in my sandbox for JPA
>>> persistence, the Aries Application packaging, etc... as these become
>>> available in Aries.
>>>
>>> I'm interested if others agree with this approach, if it seems like a
>>> worthwhile endeavor, and if it is acceptable to include this code under
>>> aries/trunk/samples.
>>>
>>> Here are the current discussion points and concerns as I see them:
>>> 1) Duplication of code between Geronimo and Aries if I check it into
>>> Aries.
>>>  However, the code is already split from the JavaEE Daytrader version and
>>> I
>>> doubt it would be possible to fully merge the code base and keep both the
>>> JavaEE and Aries versions working from a common code base without
>>> cluttering
>>> up the code with environment checks.   So, even if we keep it all in
>>> Geronimo I think we will still end up with multiple code streams.
>>> 2) The Equinox assembly version for DayTrader currently doesn't exploit
>>> anything directly in Apache Geronimo.  It depends upon the pax web
>>> container
>>> among other things.  It is certainly my intention that this should run on
>>> Geronimo when Geronimo supports osgi rfc 66 among other things.  However
>>> it
>>> seems strange to include this in Geronimo at this point in time.
>>> 3) Daytrader has always supported running in multiple web containers.  I
>>> think moving this enterprise OSGi application version of Daytrader to
>>> Aries
>>> further supports this goal and ensures that it won't become too tightly
>>> coupled to Geronimo.
>>>
>>> My apologies for the length of this description.  Please let me know your
>>> thoughts - especially if you have any concerns with checking this version
>>> of
>>> Daytrader in under
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/aries/trunk/samples
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joe
>



-- 
Alasdair Nottingham
not@apache.org

Mime
View raw message