aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Proposal for a new aries jpa 2.0 code base
Date Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:33:26 GMT
Hi Christian,

thanks for the clarification, I think that little information was the
crucial part missing :)

so +1 :D

regards, Achim


2015-04-21 13:12 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider <chris@die-schneider.net>:

> Closures are not mandatory. The jpa code does not depend on Java 8 apart
> from the closure based example of course.
>
> The JpaTemplate basically works like the sping jms templates or similar.
> So without Java 8 you would implement an anon class where you put your code
> to be run inside the transaction. In Java 8 closures just make this look
> nicer.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On 21.04.2015 12:52, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> without having the time to look at it.
>> Just one comment that crossed my mind reading it.
>> Do you really think using closures is a good idea?
>> I know JDK7 is pretty much eol, but a lot of people still are on J7
>> codebase ....
>>
>> just my 2 cents ;)
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>>
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Open Source Architect
> http://www.talend.com
>
>


-- 

Apache Member
Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>

Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message