buildr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: Next release
Date Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:49:47 GMT
@Continuous compilation:
wow, great ! Can you file bugs around ? That would help me help you.

@JRuby distro:
There is plenty of research to do, maybe ask the jruby people what they
think (I suspect there are perf and packaging improvements we could make)
and host it on rubyforge as the worst case scenario ?


On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 15:42, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh yeah, I forgot about sub-projects.  Those are a problem too.  :-)  If
> you
> have a patch, that would be awesome, otherwise I'll try to find some time
> to
> play with it.
>
> Daniel
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I'm fine with continuous compilation going in for 1.4.0.   More exposure
> > will help iron out bug.  We could label it as a 'beta' feature if we're
> > concerned about initial quality.  I've run into issues myself running it
> on
> > multi-project buildfile.  I have a patch in a git branch somewhere...
> >
> > alex
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Daniel Spiewak <djspiewak@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I vote +1 on the next release being 1.4.0.  I would also like to
> propose
> > > another major new feature for the release: continuous compilation.
>  This
> > is
> > > sitting in a basically-complete form in my GitHub fork.  I've been
> > > dogfooding it for several months now, and it seems pretty solid.  The
> > only
> > > three remaining tasks of which I am aware are as follows:
> > >
> > >   - Documentation (only a few paragraphs are necessary, I'm just too
> lazy
> > >   to have done it already)
> > >   - Specs (this is much harder.  I looked into mocking things without
> any
> > >   success.  I suspect someone with more Rspec fu would do better here)
> > >   - Scala 2.8 support (for some reason, compiler detection doesn't work
> > >   normally under Scala 2.8)
> > >
> > > I think if we could get continuous compilation into 1.4.0, it would
> > provide
> > > even more weight for this as the next "major release" for Buildr.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Alex Boisvert <
> alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Builders far and wide,
> > > >
> > > > We've got a decent amount of improvements and bug fixes done since
> > > October
> > > > /
> > > > Buildr 1.3.5 so I'd like to propose a release in the March timeframe.
> > > >
> > > > More specifically, I'd like to do a release candidate around March
> > > 13/14th
> > > > and hopefully a final release March 27/28th.
> > > >
> > > > This should leave us enough time to round up a few more issues, some
> > time
> > > > to
> > > > vote and update the site with an updated tagline (I dropped the ball
> on
> > > > that
> > > > since December) and deal with some updates/changes on the release
> side
> > > > (gemcutter).
> > > >
> > > > How does that sound?   Are we ready to call the next release 1.4.0?
> > > >
> > > > alex
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message