bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <>
Subject Re: Finally joined
Date Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:25:28 GMT
Hi all guys,
thank you very much a lot for your feedbacks :)
Gerhard, don't worry, by nature I always respect someone else's ideas
and I appreciate very much your point of you, and let me explain why
including this kind of extensions (not just Guice) is imho still a
good idea:
- added value: just providing the JSR303 core implementation could be
a limit, the added value is in a serie of tools that other similar
communities don't provide (yet);
- reusability: if different communities start adding int their project
similar features, makes sense centralizing the efforts in a single
point where everybody interested can participate.

So I would be more than pleased to start importing my stuff in the
sandbox place as Donald and Matthias suggested.
Have a nice day, all the best,

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Donald Woods <> wrote:
>> How about bringing it over into a sandbox area for now?  I don't have
> +1 that's cool with me.
>> time to look into Guice right now, but sounds like a really good
>> extension to get our project code out into more user hands.  Also, that
>> gives us time to sort out the main code package renames/reorg and build
>> updates before we pull another module in.
> I agree! A set of "plain" extension would be sweet. Especially for cutting-edge
> stuff, such as Guice.
> I think Gerhard is "concerned" since MyFaces offers 303 extensions, for JSF.
> But not everybody is using Faces ;-)
> So yes, there more "interesting" stuff we add, the better in order to
> build a strong
> (developer) community around BVAL.
> -M
>> -Donald
>> On 3/19/10 5:12 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi Gerhard,
>>> very nice to meet you :) I already started realizing a set of
>>> google-guice providers and module that simplify the
>>> javax.validation.Validator building and injection.
>>> Moreover, I' would add a org.aopalliance.intercept.MethodInterceptor
>>> that validates methods args input, raising an
>>> org.apache.bval.ValidationException if there are
>>> javax.validation.ConstraintViolation, and automate the AOP stuff
>>> marking the interested methods with an hypothetical
>>> @org.apache.bval.Validate annotation bound the in guice binder.
>>> I've already realized the 80% of the code, if you all agree I could
>>> start importing the classes in a separate module so we could finalize
>>> it all together.
>>> What do you think about it? Thanks a lot in advance, have a nice day!!!
>>> Simo
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Gerhard Petracek
>>> <> wrote:
>>>> hi simo,
>>>> which features do you plan to support?
>>>> i'm asking because we have a quite interesting situation concerning such
>>>> integrations.
>>>> (i'll provide further details later on.)
>>>> regards,
>>>> gerhard
>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>> 2010/3/18 Simone Tripodi <>
>>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>>> ver nice to meet everybody and sorry I joined the ML so late. A very
>>>>> BIG "thanks a lot" to Niall who invited me to join this amazing
>>>>> community, I hope I'll do my best to help Bean Validation growing up.
>>>>> Even if the codebase has just been imported, I'd like to propose to
>>>>> develop also 3rd part libraries integration, I already started
>>>>> developing a JSR303-Google Guice integration and this would be the
>>>>> best place to share it. What do you think about it?
>>>>> Thanks a lot in advance, all the best,
>>>>> Simo
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> blog:
> sessions:
> twitter:

View raw message