bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: bval2 release?
Date Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:56:53 GMT
bval 2.0 won't be integrated? why? Oo

Am Mi., 26. Sep. 2018 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibucau@gmail.com>:

> same here, it will likely not be integrated in tomee 8 anyway.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 14:47, Matt Benson <mbenson@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> > I think Mark and Romain were pushing to get a patch of Javadoc for the
> > Geronimo-published version of the bean validation v2 API (first). I
> haven't
> > had time to do this myself and see it as non-essential.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 8:13 PM Roberto Cortez <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi,
> > > Do you need any help to push the release forward?
> > > Cheers,Roberto
> > >     On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, 7:59:20 AM GMT+1, Mark Struberg
> > > <struberg@yahoo.de.INVALID> wrote:
> > >
> > >  right, same approach as I did.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 10.09.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > > For the ones I did, I just wrote it with "my words". This is not part
> > of
> > > > the signature so technically you can write a summary of your holidays
> > > > (don't please ;)).
> > > > If you have time let's enhance it, if not we can do a .0.1 for it, no
> > > issue
> > > > and happy to lead this next release if needed.
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson <mbenson@apache.org>
a
> > écrit
> > > :
> > > >
> > > >> The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any Javadoc to
> speak
> > > of.
> > > >> This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document an API
> > > without
> > > >> infringing the copyright of the reference API.
> > > >>
> > > >> Matt
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg
> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to push
the
> > > >>> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me
and I
> > > wait
> > > >> a
> > > >>> bit.
> > > >>> Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> LieGrue,
> > > >>> strub
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson <mbenson@apache.org>:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Good catch, Mark! Thanks!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Matt
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg
> > > >> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will
trigger
> this
> > > >> over
> > > >>> at
> > > >>>>> Geronimo.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> LieGrue,
> > > >>>>> strub
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez
> > > >>>>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.INVALID>:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Great. Let me know if I can help.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson <mbenson@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Matt
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez
> > > >>>>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid>
> > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Great! Thanks.
> > > >>>>>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver
release, so we can
> > then
> > > >>> push
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a
TomEE 8 release, so
> we
> > > >> need
> > > >>>>> both
> > > >>>>>>>> :)
> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto
> > > >>>>>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1,
Matt Benson <
> > > >>>>>>>> mbenson@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, merged!
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez
> > > >>>>> <radcortez@yahoo.com.invalid
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is
related with this:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg63326.html
> > > >> <
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg63326.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I think this should do the trick:
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1
<
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible
in the aggregator
> > > >> project.
> > > >>> I
> > > >>>>>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see
the report in the
> > processor
> > > >>>>>>>> project.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Hope it helps!
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Roberto
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish
the 1.4 release of
> > > >> Commons
> > > >>>>>>>>> Weaver.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since
traffic on the Commons ML
> > > >> alerted
> > > >>>>> me
> > > >>>>>>>>> that
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp
report is actually
> > > running
> > > >>>>> with
> > > >>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take
another look this Friday.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Matt
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas
Andraschko <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> andraschko.thomas@gmail.com <mailto:
> > andraschko.thomas@gmail.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain
Manni-Bucau <
> > > >>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:rmannibucau@gmail.com>>:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau
<
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>>
|  Blog
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/
<
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>>
| Old Blog
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
<
> > > >>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
<
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>>
| Book
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
<
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java->
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46,
Mark Struberg
> > > >>>>>>>>> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid <mailto:struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hi folks!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a
BVal-2.0.0 release?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK,
so we should really kick it off
> I'd
> > > >> say.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message