cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aaron Morton (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-2590) row delete breaks read repair
Date Mon, 09 May 2011 10:05:03 GMT


Aaron Morton updated CASSANDRA-2590:

    Attachment: 0001-2590-v3.patch

2590-v3 uses removeDeleted() in RowRepairResolver.resolveSuperset() and includes tests in

CASSANDRA-2621 shows that QueryFilter.collectCollatedColumns() returns a CF with deleted columns
and the caller should use removeDeleted. 

Continuing to use CF.resolve() seemed like the minimum change. Let me know if you think we
should still use QueryFilter to resolve the differences. 

> row delete breaks read repair 
> ------------------------------
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2590
>                 URL:
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.5, 0.8 beta 1
>            Reporter: Aaron Morton
>            Assignee: Aaron Morton
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: 0001-2590-v3.patch, 0001-cf-resolve-test-and-possible-solution-for-read-repai.patch,
> related to CASSANDRA-2589 
> Working at CL ALL can get inconsistent reads after row deletion. Reproduced on the 0.7
and 0.8 source. 
> Steps to reproduce:
> # two node cluster with rf 2 and HH turned off
> # insert rows via cli 
> # flush both nodes 
> # shutdown node 1
> # connect to node 2 via cli and delete one row
> # bring up node 1
> # connect to node 1 via cli and issue get with CL ALL 
> # first get returns the deleted row, second get returns zero rows.
> RowRepairResolver.resolveSuperSet() resolves a local CF with the old row columns, and
the remote CF which is marked for deletion. CF.resolve() does not pay attention to the deletion
flags and the resolved CF has both markedForDeletion set and a column with a lower timestamp.
The return from resolveSuperSet() is used as the return for the read without checking if the
cols are relevant. 
> Also when RowRepairResolver.mabeScheduleRepairs() runs it sends two mutations. Node 1
is given the row level deletation, and Node 2 is given a mutation to write the old (and now
deleted) column from node 2. I have some log traces for this if needed. 
> A quick fix is to check for relevant columns in the RowRepairResolver, will attach shortly.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message