cassandra-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Hanna (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-13315) Semantically meaningful Consistency Levels
Date Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:51:41 GMT


Jeremy Hanna commented on CASSANDRA-13315:

Should we default it to the local DC instead of global and then add a prefix or suffix to
it if it needs to be global?  I'm just thinking that in a multi-dc environment, it's more
common to think in terms of the local DC, at least in terms of required CL.

> Semantically meaningful Consistency Levels
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-13315
>                 URL:
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ryan Svihla
> New users really struggle with consistency level and fall into a large number of tarpits
trying to decide on the right one.
> o
> 1. There are a LOT of consistency levels and it's up to the end user to reason about
what combinations are valid and what is really what they intend it to be. Is there any reason
why write at ALL and read at CL TWO is better than read at CL ONE? 
> 2. They require a good understanding of failure modes to do well. It's not uncommon for
people to use CL one and wonder why their data is missing.
> 3. The serial consistency level "bucket" is confusing to even write about and easy to
get wrong even for experienced users.
> So I propose the following steps (EDIT based on Jonathan's comment):
> 1. Remove the "serial consistency" level of consistency levels and just have all consistency
levels in one bucket to set, conditions still need to be required for SERIAL/LOCAL_SERIAL
> 2. add 3 new consistency levels pointing to existing ones but that infer intent much
more cleanly:
> EDIT better names bases on comments.
>    * EVENTUALLY = LOCAL_ONE reads and writes
>    * STRONG = LOCAL_QUORUM reads and writes
>    * SERIAL = LOCAL_SERIAL reads and writes (though a ton of folks dont know what SERIAL
means so this is why I suggested TRANSACTIONAL even if its not as correct as Id like)
> for global levels of this I propose keeping the old ones around, they're rarely used
in the field except by accident or particularly opinionated and advanced users.
> Drivers should put the new consistency levels in a new package and docs should be updated
to suggest their use. Likewise setting default CL should only provide those three settings
and applying it for reads and writes at the same time.
> CQLSH I'm gonna suggest should default to HIGHLY_CONSISTENT. New sysadmins get surprised
by this frequently and I can think of a couple very major escalations because people were
confused what the default behavior was.
> The benefit to all this change is we shrink the surface area that one has to understand
when learning Cassandra greatly, and we have far less bad initial experiences and surprises.
New users will more likely be able to wrap their brains around those 3 ideas more readily
then they can "what happens when I have RF2, QUROUM writes and ONE reads". Advanced users
get access to all the way still, while new users don't have to learn all the ins and outs
of distributed theory just to write data and be able to read it back.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message