cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack and UI [RC1]
Date Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:37:06 GMT

Here are the convenience packages build from if you don't want to build CloudStack
from the source artifacts:

Packages: (Debian, CentOS7, and CentOS8)

4.15 systemvmtemplate:

Build from the master branch of (if/after
voting passes, we'll update and publish the docs):

Additional notes:

  *   The new UI is bundled within the cloudstack-managment package and is shipped as the
default UI served at <host:8080>/client, old UI will be served via <host:8080>/client/legacy.
Most users don't need to do any separate installation or perform an installation step.
  *   We've added support for CentOS8 with 4.15 but CentOS8 will EOL in Dec 2021 (


From: Daan Hoogland <>
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 16:33
To: dev <>; users <>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack and UI [RC1]

I was pointed at a c&p technology fail. The vote is to be open for 3
business days usually and that does not end by the 15th of January but by
the 15th of December. I would actually leave it open until the end of next
business week to give everybody a good chance to review. So this vote is
open until the 18th (of December!)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:43 AM Daan Hoogland <>

> LS,
> Long overdue we have a set of artifacts to call version \o/
> We are voting for the new UI (former secret project name primate) and the
> main code pack. the commitish are
> main code: acce0c9ee733b0e343fe01a5972016f355f3a560
> ui code: d9e5e65781b88caa3b58d1874190ed5a4cce5239
> The candidate release branch is The UI is still
> separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming releases,
> at least from a version management point of view.
> The artifacts up for a vote can be found at:
> The gpg keys are located at
> the key used
> was 7975062401944786
> The vote will be open for 3 business days (until 15th January).
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging over
> the next few days.
> The documentation repo will be updated as we move along, as we might get
> some unexpected :-1:s on this candidate.
> --
> Daan


3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message