commons-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gary Gregory (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Updated: (CODEC-75) Make Base64 URL-safe
Date Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:33:15 GMT


Gary Gregory updated CODEC-75:

    Summary: Make Base64 URL-safe  (was: Base64 URL-SAFE)

> Make Base64 URL-safe
> --------------------
>                 Key: CODEC-75
>                 URL:
>             Project: Commons Codec
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Julius Davies
>             Fix For: 1.4
>         Attachments: codec75.patch
> Regular Base64 uses + and / for code point 62 and 63.  URL-Safe Base64 uses - and _ instead.
 Also, URL-Safe base64 omits the == padding to help preserve space.
> Approach:
> decode() should be able to seamlessly handle either situation.  This means interpreting
+- and /_ as equivalents at any time during the decode.  decode() also needs to be more robust
against missing padding characters.
> encode() should either emit +/ or -_ depending on a mode set during Base64 construction.
> Since URL-SAFE is all about URL's (e.g. HTTP GET) and most browsers are limited to 1KB
of query string, I do not think we need to bother making the URL-MODE available in the stream-oriented
classes.  (Nonetheless, the streams should be able to decode URL-SAFE, but I don't think they
should produce it).
> ---
> Some background information:  I'm putting together a webapp that integrates with MS Active
Directory.  Users and Groups are keyed of objectGUID with is a 128 bit int.  Would be nice
to get some support for this kind of thing:
> "Click to view the profile of <a href='?u=_3-PwBzbRxqMi1qTBhg_6A'>Julius Davies</a>."
> Right now I'm using Hex:
> "Click to view the profile of <a href='?u=ff7f8fc01cdb471a8c8b5a9306183fe8'>Julius
> Current Base64 class would output this, and I suspect the + would screw things up:
> "Click to view the profile of <a href='?u=/3+PwBzbRxqMi1qTBhg/6A=='>Julius Davies</a>."

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message