db-derby-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Derek Roscoe" <derek.ros...@lexhold.com>
Subject RE: DERBY 10.5 | Embedded vs Server Based
Date Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:00:18 GMT
Knut, hi!

Thanks for the response and help.  I truly appreciate it.  Would you feel
the same way if it were a public website with thousands of users?  Thanks
again for your time!

DEREK J ROSCOE l director l 1500 bull lea road - suite 110 l lexington,
kentucky 40511-1267 usa
d: 859.243.5734 l o: 859.243.5730 l f: 800.548.6829 l e:

-----Original Message-----
From: Knut.Hatlen@Sun.COM [mailto:Knut.Hatlen@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 8:05 AM
To: Derby Discussion
Subject: Re: DERBY 10.5 | Embedded vs Server Based

Derek J Roscoe <derek.roscoe@lexhold.com> writes:

> Hello,
> I am new to derby and database creation all together.  I want to know with
> method of Derby I should set up Embedded or Server Based.  I am setting up
> website where users will be filling out a form that will submit the
> information to be stored about each and every user (username, password,
> demographics, etc.).  The submission form(s) will be dynamic pages created
> Dreamweaver, which will then be read by ColdFusion before being displayed
> those ultimately accessing the information.

Hi Derek,

If the database is only accessed by a single process, which I think is
the case here, I'd probably go for embedded since it's easier to set up
and has less overhead.

Knut Anders

View raw message