directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <>
Subject Re: [discussion] Lowering barrier for perspective committers
Date Sat, 08 Jul 2006 10:22:02 GMT
John E. Conlon wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 14:48 -0400, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>> Timothy Bennett wrote:
>>> On 7/6/06, *Alex Karasulu* < 
>>> <>> wrote:
>>>     The number of active committers on Apache Directory Server is dwindling
>>>     and we have many areas where a single developer has been working alone.
>>>     Some email threads have tried to address the issue of the lack of
>>>     enough
>>>     committers in specific areas: see threads [0] & [1].  So we are
>>>     suffering mostly in the following areas:
>>>     o OSGi effort,
>>>     o Kerberos protocol development,
>>>     o Changepw protocol development,
>>>     o DHCP protocol development, and
>>>     o DNS protocol development.
>>> As a former committer at Apache Avalon Merlin project and a current 
>>> committer at Apache Felix, I'm highly interested in the OSGi effort at 
>>> Apache Directory, and I'd like to be a part of helping in that effort.  
>>> However, I know next to nothing about the internals of ADS, but I'm 
>>> willing to learn.  And a good way may be to dig in and help document the 
>>> code.
>> I think we all know your contributions on other projects and your a 
>> great candidate for this especially with your involvement on Felix.  I 
>> think it would be nice to have both you and John Conlon working with 
>> Enrique on this stuff.
>> BTW code documentation and docs in general are far far more important to 
>> me than writing the code itself. 
> Alex you mentioned documentation and an internals class that you were
> planing. Have you seen Peter Kriens blog entry 
> on a style of documentation suitable for component and service
> development?

No I have not but thanks for pointing it out.  I'm looking at it right 
now.  Nice entry!

> Since Enrique has implemented the fundamental components of the ADS OSGi
> framework in the 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT,  perhaps we could concentrate on
> documenting these components (and thus the major building blocks of ADS)
> in the fashion similar to what Peter has suggested in his blog? 

Sure sounds like a good idea.  Timothy are you interested in working on 
this as well?

For your
> internals class (and the web site) we could use this documentation as
> the high level horizontal documentation. For the details of the
> internals you can drill down conceptually and graphically into each
> component revealing more details the deeper you go.

I like that.

> The horizontal documentation will be targeted to system engineers,
> component assemblers, and system administrators while the internals will
> provide the additional details needed for developers.
This is excellent.  Any thoughts from others?  Tim?


View raw message