drill-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vova Vysotskyi <vvo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Publish Drill Calcite project artifacts to Apache maven repository
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:32:04 GMT
Thanks for your responses and clarifications!

Regarding the reasons for using the fork:
We would love to move to the Apache Calcite instead of using the fork!

And we tried very hard to do it, especially during the rebase from 1.4 to
1.15 (DRILL-3993 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-3993>).
But unfortunately, there left three Jiras, which weren't accepted by the
Calcite community yet:
CALCITE-2087 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2087>,
CALCITE-2018 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> and
CALCITE-1178 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1178>.

Kind regards,
Volodymyr Vysotskyi

On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 7:39 PM Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:

> I can confirm what Josh says about OSSRH. You need to fill out a form with
> Sonatype that convinces them that you own the groupId (basically a domain
> name). Then they give you authorization to publish artifacts under that
> groupId. For example, I publish artifacts under the sqlline and
> net.hydromatic groupIds.
> > On Sep 12, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Maven central is made up of a number of "Trusted" Maven repositories.
> This includes the ASF and OSSRH Maven repositories. Many other
> organizations run "mirrors" of central.
> >
> > The ASF Maven repo is published to by ASF projects who have gone through
> the ASF release process. OSSRH allows any release which meets the criteria
> described here[1]. As an individual, you are within your rights to publish
> your fork of Calcite to OSSRH as long as there are no legal or trademark
> concerns. It would be imperative to not cause confusion with official
> Apache Calcite releases -- clear branding and separate Maven
> groupId/artifactId "coordinates" should be sufficient.
> >
> > However, since you are (presumably) acting as a member of Apache Drill,
> it would be very odd (and potentially against ASF policy) to make a release
> of software that *isn't* using the ASF Maven resources. This gives me some
> pause -- do you have an ASF member on your PMC you can run this by?
> >
> > Finally, as a Calcite PMC member, I feel obligated to ask why Drill
> needs to maintain this fork, and see if there is something that can be done
> from the Calcite side to get you "back on upstream"? Why the need to make
> long-term plans to isolate Apache Drill from Apache Calcite?
> >
> > [1] https://central.sonatype.org/pages/ossrh-guide.html
> >
> > On 9/12/18 11:33 AM, Vova Vysotskyi wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >> As you know, Drill uses its fork of Apache Calcite.
> >> In DRILL-6711 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-6711> was
> >> proposed to deploy Drill Calcite project artifacts
> >> to Apache Maven repository or at least to the central maven repository.
> >> I have looked for the similar cases of fork versions and didn't find
> >> anything similar in the central repo.
> >> Also, I have looked at the Sonatype OSSRH Jiras for similar cases
> >> of deploying fork versions, but that projects used custom groupIds.
> >> Could someone please give me the advice what is the acceptable way
> >> of publishing the custom Drill Calcite artifacts to the central repo and
> >> is it possible to publish them without changing groupId?
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Volodymyr Vysotskyi

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message