falcon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Srikanth Sundarrajan <srik...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Falcon 1.0
Date Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:25:29 GMT
Am +1 for 1.0 release and also feel that newer and more attractive features can follow. I dont
know if there was any outcome on the approach to API versioning discussion that we had earlier
this year, we should re-initiate that discussion and close if there is general consensus for
RegardsSrikanth Sundarrajan

> From: ajayyadava@apache.org
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:55:53 +0000
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Falcon 1.0
> To: dev@falcon.apache.org
> Hello everyone,
> Now that 0.10 has been successfully released, thanks to heroic efforts of
> Balu, I think it is time to start discussion on our long pending 1.0
> release :) I specifically want to discuss the following items.
> *Scope / Change Threshold for calling it 1.0*
> We need to decide on the bare minimum changes to call it 1.0  I know at
> least 2 views on this in the community
>    1. First view is that 1.0 is all about API stability, Once we have
>    stabilized the existing API, we can call it 1.0. There are already some
>    changes committed to trunk like a new shell, moving post processing to
>    server side, REST API Revamp and some more lifecycle changes which will
>    definitely come in 1.0 This should be enough to do a meaningful 1.0 release.
>    2. Another view is that we need to have lot of marketable features and
>    new capabilities to call it 1.0 so that we can publicize it enough and ask
>    audience to reconsider falcon even if they found Apache Falcon short for
>    their use cases.
> Please chime in with your thoughts :)
> *Call for Volunteer*
> As discussed in last developer sync up, Pragya communicated to me that she
> has very high work load at her office and will not be able to take out time
> for release activities. If there are any committers who haven't yet done a
> release and want to volunteer for 1.0, then please reply to this thread,
> else I will assume the role of Release Manager for 1.0. Many release
> activities require karma available only to committers, hence only
> committers can volunteer.
> Regards
> Ajay Yadava
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message