flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From rtudoran <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] flink pull request #3889: [FLINK-6075] - Support Limit/Top(Sort) for Stream ...
Date Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:28:42 GMT
Github user rtudoran commented on a diff in the pull request:

    --- Diff: flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/stream/sql/SortTest.scala
    @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.flink.table.api.scala.stream.sql
    +import org.apache.flink.api.scala._
    +import org.apache.flink.table.api.TableException
    +import org.apache.flink.table.api.scala._
    +import org.apache.flink.table.utils.TableTestUtil._
    +import org.apache.flink.table.utils.{StreamTableTestUtil, TableTestBase}
    +import org.junit.Test
    +class SortTest extends TableTestBase {
    +  private val streamUtil: StreamTableTestUtil = streamTestUtil()
    +  streamUtil.addTable[(Int, String, Long)]("MyTable", 'a, 'b, 'c,
    +      'proctime.proctime, 'rowtime.rowtime)
    +  @Test
    +  def testSortProcessingTime() = {
    +    val sqlQuery = "SELECT a FROM MyTable ORDER BY proctime, c"
    +    val expected =
    +      unaryNode(
    +        "DataStreamCalc",
    +        unaryNode("DataStreamSort",
    +          streamTableNode(0),
    +          term("orderBy", "proctime ASC", "c ASC"),
    +          term("offset", "null"), 
    +          term("fetch","unlimited")),
    +        term("select", "a", "TIME_MATERIALIZATION(proctime) AS proctime", "c"))
    --- End diff --
    yes and no :)
    Perhaps you remember that in the previous PR I pointed this issue out. Calcite as it creates
the execution plan now will have as the output type of the sort a tuple for each of the 3
fields (a, proctime, and c)...because one comes from the output and 2 are used internally.
The sort does not do any projection so all the 3 fields needed in the input are carried in
the output - hence the type of the output. I have asked you at that point if you believe we
should drop the fields by ourselves - which you said no and I agree with that. This test is
only the reflection of that case - basically the whole plan of calcite should be modified....

If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.

View raw message