gora-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ferdy Galema <ferdy.gal...@kalooga.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Gora 0.3 Release
Date Tue, 24 Jul 2012 07:05:18 GMT
Hi,

Does 0.2.x mean that is not created from trunk but from the 0.2 branch
(that is created from the 0.2 tag)? If this is the case, do we have to
merge specific changes from trunk? Or what is exactly the idea?

Ferdy

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kazuomi Kashii <kazuomi@kashii.net> wrote:

> +1 for 0.2.1 release with gora-cassandra and other updates.
>
> We may need another 0.2.x release to address "delete" and "query" related
> issues.
>
> It seems that Avro upgrade to 1.7.x is more major one.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kaz
>
> P.S.
> Lewis, thanks for your advice to add myself to developers of pom.xml.
>
>
>
> On 7/23/12 12:35 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
>
>> OK coming back to this then
>>
>> Henry put either 0.2.1 or 0.3 into the picture are there any
>> preferences???
>> Personally over the last while my feelings have switched slightly and
>> there are a few events which have caused this.
>>
>> 1) gora-cassandra has been pretty well turned up side down, totally
>> revamped, it is looking bang up to date, however it has not been
>> tested extensively by the community and therefore we don't have 100%
>> assurances that it is all OK.
>> 2) We have a rather (crucially) important patch lingering which is
>> Ed's excellent contribution for upgrading to Avro 1.7.X... He's
>> mentioned that there are changes to the API... this being said would
>> it be sensible to release the gora-cassandra work in parallel with the
>> important upgrade to the Gora/Avro API? I am not convinced on this one
>> and think that a more incremental approach would be more suitable.
>> What do you guys think?
>> 3) There are a number of issues pending with regards to the semantics
>> for deletes in Gora. I very much doubt these will be addressed in the
>> imminent short term, therefore maybe a 0.2.X release may be more
>> suitable to release a number of improvements before stepping up to the
>> 0,3 stage? Maybe we could leave 0.3 for the structural changes brought
>> about via the outcome of the GSoC project... once these have been
>> viewed and if they are accepted by the community at large.
>>
>> It would be great to kick of conversation on this one now that
>> gora-cassandra tests have somewhat stabilized for the time being.
>> There is still work to be done here but maybe this is for another
>> 0.2.X release somewhere down the line?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Lewis
>>
>>
>>  On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Kazuomi Kashii <kazuomi@kashii.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lewis,
>>>>
>>>> Did you mean CHAGES.txt ?
>>>> I think pom.xml is not required to change for GORA-143.
>>>>
>>>> -Kaz
>>>>
>>> @Kaz
>> I meant something like this in parent pom.xml
>>
>>       <developer>
>> +      <id>kazk</id>
>> +      <name>Kazuomi Kashii</name>
>> +      <email>kazk [at] apache [dot] org</email>
>> +      <roles>
>> +        <role>Committer</role>
>> +        <role>PPMC Member</role>
>> +      </roles>
>> +    </developer>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message