hadoop-mapreduce-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tsuyoshi OZAWA <ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Assume Private-Unstable for classes that are not annotated
Date Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:32:17 GMT
+1 for Karthik's suggestion.

- Tsuyoshi

On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Karthik Kambatla <kasha@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi devs
>
> As you might have noticed, we have several classes and methods in them that
> are not annotated at all. This is seldom intentional. Avoiding incompatible
> changes to all these classes can be considerable baggage.
>
> I was wondering if we should add an explicit disclaimer in our
> compatibility guide that says, "Classes without annotations are to
> considered @Private"
>
> For methods, is it reasonable to say - "Class members without specific
> annotations inherit the annotations of the class"?
>
> Thanks
> Karthik



-- 
- Tsuyoshi

Mime
View raw message