hadoop-yarn-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: libyarn?
Date Mon, 21 Oct 2013 16:32:44 GMT
Milind, one thing to keep in mind, if I got previous discussions right, is
that the API stability in Hadoop 2 it does not include PB protocols yet but
client APIs.

Cheers.


On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Eli Collins <eli@cloudera.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Milind Bhandarkar <
> mbhandarkar@gopivotal.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your input, Eli.
> >
> > Since you mention libhdfs, now that hdfs PB protocols have stabilized,
> for
> > quite some time, would folks think that a native C binding for hdfs
> belongs
> > outside of HDFS? I think libyarn decision should be based on similar
> > feeling  too.
> >
> >
> It would be incompatible to remove it, and it's actively maintained in-tree
> by the same people who work on hdfs so I don't see why we'd want to remove
> it.  Again, the decision should be made by the community of people working
> on libhdfs.
>
> Ditto libyarn, if they want to contribute the code to Yarn why don't they
> do so?
>



-- 
Alejandro

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message