hbase-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3) is available for download
Date Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:26:24 GMT
I don't think so.

Please take a look at the new test - TestSCVFWithMiniCluster
It exposes the defect Fabien reported. Without the fix, two of the
sub-tests in TestSCVFWithMiniCluster would fail.

Cheers


On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:20 AM, James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com> wrote:

> It's just the optimization that's (sometimes) broken, right? The scan
> still returns the correct results, no?
>
> > On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > James:
> > HBASE-10850 is not just about SingleColumnValueFilter. See Anoop's
> comment:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10850?focusedCommentId=13958668&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13958668
> >
> > The test case Fabien provided uses SingleColumnValueFilter but the defect
> > has deeper implication beyond making SingleColumnValueFilter unusable in
> > certain scenarios.
> >
> > I am find with giving the next RC a bit shorter voting period.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:57 AM, James Taylor <jtaylor@salesforce.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I implore you to stick with releasing RC3. Phoenix 4.0 has no release it
> >> can currently run on. Phoenix doesn't use SingleColumnValueFilter, so it
> >> seems that HBASE-10850 has no impact wrt Phoenix. Can't we get these
> >> additional bugs in 0.98.2 - it's one month away [1]?
> >>
> >>    James
> >>
> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:34 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> >> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Will target HBASE-10899 also then by that time.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Ram
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Understood, Andy.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have integrated fix for HBASE-10850 to 0.98
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> >> andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I will sink this RC and roll a new one tomorrow.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, I may very well release the next RC even if I am the only
+1
> >>>> vote
> >>>>> and testing it causes your workstation to catch fire. So please
take
> >>> the
> >>>>> time to commit whatever you feel is needed to the 0.98 branch or
file
> >>>>> blockers against 0.98.1 in the next 24 hours. This is it for 0.98.1.
> >>>>> 0.98.2 will happen a mere 30 days from the 0.98.1 release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I agree with Anoop's assessment.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Anoop John <anoop.hbase@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> After analysing HBASE-10850  I think better we can fix this
in
> >> 98.1
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>> itself.  Also Phoenix plan to use this 98.1 and Phoenix
uses
> >>> essential
> >>>>> CF
> >>>>>>> optimization.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Also HBASE-10854 can be included in 98.1 in such a case,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Considering those we need a new RC.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Anoop-
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:19 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> >>>>>>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 on the RC.
> >>>>>>>> Checked the signature.
> >>>>>>>> Downloaded the source, built and ran the testcases.
> >>>>>>>> Ran Integration Tests with ACL and Visibility labels.
 Everything
> >>>> looks
> >>>>>>>> fine.
> >>>>>>>> Compaction, flushes etc too.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> Ram
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Elliott Clark <
> >> eclark@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Checked the hash
> >>>>>>>>> Checked the tar layout.
> >>>>>>>>> Played with a single node.  Everything seemed good
after ITBLL
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The hash is good.  Doc. and layout looks good.
 UI seems fine.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Ran on small cluster w/ default hadoop 2.2 in
hbase against a
> >> tip
> >>>> of
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> branch hadoop 2.4 cluster.  Seems to basically
work (small big
> >>>> linked
> >>>>>>>>> list
> >>>>>>>>>> test worked).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> TSDB seems to work fine against this RC.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I don't mean to be stealing our Jon's thunder
but in case he is
> >>> too
> >>>>>>>>>> occupied to vote here, I'll note that he has
gotten our
> >> internal
> >>>> rig
> >>>>>>>>>> running against the tip of the 0.98 branch and
it has been
> >>> passing
> >>>>>>>> green
> >>>>>>>>>> running IT tests on a small cluster over hours.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> St.Ack
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Andrew Purtell
<
> >>>>> apurtell@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The 4th HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC3)
is available for
> >>>>>>>> download
> >>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC3/
and Maven
> >>> artifacts
> >>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>>> available in the temporary repository
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1016
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can
be found here:
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1
by midnight
> >> Pacific
> >>>> Time
> >>>>>>>>>> (00:00
> >>>>>>>>>>> PDT) on April 6 on whether or not we should
release this as
> >>>> 0.98.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Andy
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth
by hitting back. -
> >>>> Piet
> >>>>>>>>> Hein
> >>>>>>>>>>> (via Tom White)
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message