ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ken Cheng <kcheng....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: About the Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1481
Date Wed, 03 Feb 2016 06:43:33 GMT
I prefer to throw a IgniteCheckerException.

Thanks,
kcheng

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Ken Cheng <kcheng.mvp@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andrey Gura,
>
>
> What's the expected behavior when the cache mode is "Local" but affinity
> function is not  "LocalAffinityFunction"?
>
> 1: Throw an exception?
> 2: or change the affinity function rudely as "LocalAffinityFunction" and
> log the warning message at same time?
>
>
> Thanks,
> kcheng
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ken Cheng <kcheng.mvp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrey Gura,
>>
>> Thank you very much! I would study this part of code first.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> kcheng
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Andrey Gura <agura@gridgain.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ken,
>>>
>>> cache configuration validation and initialization occurs in
>>> GridCacheProcessor class (methods validate() and initialize()).
>>>
>>> From my point of view two changes should be made:
>>>
>>> - during cache intialization LocalAffinityFunction should be set to cache
>>> configuration if cache mode is LOCAL;
>>> - warning about ignoring affinity function parameter should be moved from
>>> validate() method to intialize() method.
>>>
>>> I hope this will help you.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ken Cheng <kcheng.mvp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Andrey Gura,
>>> >
>>> > I am very new to Ignite, I am going to pick up
>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1481.
>>> >
>>> > Can you please give more hint?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > kcheng
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrey Gura
>>> GridGain Systems, Inc.
>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message