ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 1.8 Release
Date Fri, 02 Dec 2016 17:26:04 GMT
Vladimir,

Agree. The issue looks critical. Who will be reviewing it? 

—
Denis

> On Dec 2, 2016, at 2:35 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com> wrote:
> 
> Igniters,
> 
> I assembled and merged release notes to the branch ignite-1.8. Looks like
> we are almost ready to start vote. The only outstanding issue which looks
> pretty nasty to me is IGNITE-4340 [1]. Let's wait until it resolved and
> start vote, unless anyone has some other concerns.
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4340
> 
> Vladimir.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Igor Sapego <isapego@gridgain.com> wrote:
> 
>> Denis,
>> 
>> I've took a look on the first issue [1], and it seems like it was already
>> resolved
>> by another fix made by Alexander.
>> 
>> For the second issue [2] I have raised a PR.
>> 
>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346
>> [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Igor
>> 
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> I’ve faced with two more issues while was working with Ignite from PHP
>> PDO
>>> side.
>>> 
>>> The first one is related to DML.
>>> DML and PHP PDO: double field is converted to bigdecimal <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4346>
>>> 
>>> Alexander P. and Igor S. please pull together and fix this issue before
>>> 1.8 is sent for vote.
>>> 
>>> The second issue is related to ODBC and affects the usability only. Igor
>>> S., please try to address it as a part of 1.8 as well.
>>> ODBC: NPE when cache name is different from the one configured in DSN <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4347>
>>> 
>>> —
>>> Denis
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> Update for DML testing:
>>>> 
>>>> IGNITE-4342 DML: clear() on atomic cache causes the exception from
>>> previous
>>>> failed DML statement <https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4342>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Vladimir,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please add to the release notes information regarding this feature
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310 <
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2310>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Essentially, it allows locking a partition while a remote computation
>> is
>>>>> being executed on a node. I’ve already documented the feature here.
>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods <
>>>>> http://apacheignite.gridgain.org/v1.7/docs/collocate-
>>>>> compute-and-data#affinity-call-and-run-methods>
>>>>> 
>>>>> —
>>>>> Denis
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 25, 2016, at 4:08 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I need to create RELEASE NOTES. Please advise which notable tickets
>> you
>>>>>> completed as a part of 1.8 release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com
>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Could someone explain why Cassandra module splitted into three
parts
>>> in
>>>>>>> optional directory for binary fabric build? At the moment I see
>>>>> following
>>>>>>> unclear points
>>>>>>> 1. ignite-cassandra directory contains README.txt only
>>>>>>> 2. Does ignite-cassandra-serializers depend on
>> ignite-cassandra-store?
>>>>> In
>>>>>>> that case why do not make one module?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already
merged
>>> in
>>>>>>>> 1.8 branch).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull
>>>>>>>> requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not
fixed).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <skozlov@gridgain.com>:
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I found two issues for 1.8:
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to
send
>> message
>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>> node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304
>>> 
>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong
result
>>>>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Could someone experienced take a look?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA
reports
>> several
>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML
finalization in
>>>>>>>> ignite-1.8
>>>>>>>>>> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting
them for the
>>> next
>>>>>>>>>> release (1.9, 2.0?).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <
>> isapego@gridgain.com
>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them
into ignite-1.8.
>> But
>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>> have some
>>>>>>>>>>> failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently
working on them.
>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>> is a
>>>>>>>>>>> ticket for
>>>>>>>>>>> that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my
findings there.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda
<dmagda@apache.org
>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome news, thanks for making this happen!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO
related changes?
>>>>>>> Can I
>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>>> testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability
<
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander
Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi
that DML branch is now
>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be included into 1.8 branch that is to
be created.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minor review fixes, should they be made,
and test fixes will
>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches
later.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, it'd been agreed that, in order
to deliver these new
>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, two subtasks will be fixed in later
releases (shortly):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On failing tests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?
>>>>>>>>>>>> focusedCommentId=15683377
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander
Paschenko
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vlad,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Most likely today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir
Ozerov <
>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I went through remaining tickets
assigned to 1.8 and it
>> seems
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty close to release. As far
as I understand the biggest
>>>>>>>>>> remaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature is DML [1]. I think we
can create separate branch
>> for
>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as it is merged. Alex, do you
have any idea on when it might
>>>>>>>>>> happen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06
AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That versions will be created
after 1.8 gets released.
>>>>>>> Recently
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a discussion on the dev list
[1] regarding the difficulties
>>>>>>>>>> related
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation maintenance
when several documentation
>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>> co-exist at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was decided that rather
then create a new version for
>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once a new feature added
to Ignite it’s better to create a
>>>>>>>> hidden
>>>>>>>>>>> page
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under the current documentation
version and make it visible
>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version is created after
the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The bottom line is that,
please create a hidden page with a
>>>>>>>> suffix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “page_name-1.8” and once
1.8 gets released Prachi will
>> create
>>>>>>>>>>>> readme.io <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8
and make your doc visible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-
>>>>>>>>>>> td10868.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00
PM, Roman Shtykh
>>>>>>>>>>> <rshtykh@yahoo.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0
in readme.io for new features?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Roman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, November
16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It makes sense to wait
for me while everything gets merged
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then. Please let me know
over this discussion when the
>>>>>>> overall
>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happens.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016,
at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <
>>>>>>>> isapego@gridgain.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can merge PDO-related
changes into 1.8 but without DML
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and even compilation
so I don't see any sense in doing
>> that
>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>> DML
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is merged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After DML is ready
and merged I'll need some time to
>> merge
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything works
as intended. The code itself, tests
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> examples
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are ready.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016
at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:ptupitsyn@apache.org>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, [1] depends
on [2], and [2](.NET:
>>>>>>> CacheEntryProcessor
>>>>>>>>>>> binary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not a simple thing.
We won't be able to do that for
>> 1.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other than that,
I'll try to fit as many of them as I
>> can.
>>>>>>>> But I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer your question
since I don't see any date yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By the way, you were
going to help with the reviews.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016
at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> dmagda@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:dmagda@apache.org>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Alexander P.,
Igor S.,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When will your
merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related
>>>>>>> changes
>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? I’m
looking forward to go through PDO [1]
>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>> and be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that everything
works as described on my side.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Pavel,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think
it will be possible to complete all the
>> .NET
>>>>>>>>>>> usability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets [2] under
1.8 and roll them out to the Apache
>>>>>>> Ignite
>>>>>>>>>>> users?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016,
at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <
>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dmagda@gridgain.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have a
branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release process
of 1.8?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016,
at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@gmail.com
<mailto:
>>>>>>>> alexander.a.paschenko@
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current status
on DML:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Basic data
streamer support implemented (basicness is
>>>>>>>> mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration
- say, currently there's no way to specify
>>>>>>>>>>> streamer's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch size via
JDBC driver, but this can be improved
>>>>>>>> easily).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Fixed all minor
stuff agreed with Vladimir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There are some
tests that started failing after binary
>>>>>>>> hash
>>>>>>>>>>> codes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generation rework
made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1
>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>> ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> him to look into
it and fix those. Failing tests live in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest,
and are as
>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added them
personally during working on first version
>> of
>>>>>>>> auto
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hashing few weeks
ago, and what they do is test these
>> very
>>>>>>>>>>> hashing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features. Again,
prior to Vlad's rework those tests
>>>>>>> passed.
>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you please take
a look?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Working on
Sergey V.'s comments about current code.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message