ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.5 release
Date Thu, 17 May 2018 15:07:30 GMT
We keep facing the issues that postpone the release over and over again
which seems like a never-ending story.

What are the changes the users come across the 2 latest bugs you've
mentioned (any special conditions)?

What's the overall state of our testing cycles? When would we send the
release for vote if include the abovementioned bugs or move them to the
next release?

--
Denis

On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Another issue that may lead to incorrect recovery on node startup is
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8464 which is already in PA.
> I
> suggest we also include it to 2.5 given that fix improves stability of the
> persistence layer. Any objections?
>
> 2018-05-17 16:55 GMT+03:00 Ivan Rakov <ivan.glukos@gmail.com>:
>
> > Andrey, Igniters,
> >
> > I bumped into this issue while trying to reproduce another:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8320
> > I think, this fix worth being cherry-picked into 2.5. Possibility of
> > AssertionError on persistence level is really undesirable for Ignite as a
> > product.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ivan Rakov
> >
> >
> > On 14.05.2018 15:59, Andrey Gura wrote:
> >
> >> Igniters,
> >>
> >> we are ready to start process of releasing Apache Ignite 2.5.
> >>
> >> So code freeze. No more commits to ignite-2.5 branch.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Andrey Gura <agura@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Igniters,
> >>>
> >>> Almost all issues for Apache Ignite 2.5 release are fixed. Issues that
> >>> are still in Open state will be moved to 2.6 release.
> >>>
> >>> Code freeze for ignite-2.5 branch is planed for tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Gura <agura@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks for fast update, Ivan.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glukos@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Andrey,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry to disturb you again. I have a follow up fix for IGNITE-8429
-
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8453.
> >>>>> Please merge it to master and ignite-2.5.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best Regards,
> >>>>> Ivan Rakov
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 08.05.2018 15:29, Vladimir Ozerov wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> H2 version updated is moved to AI 2.6. There are several serious
> >>>>>> problems,
> >>>>>> main - spatial dependency replacement which is a breaking change.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> ptupitsyn@apache.org
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> IGNITE-8434 merged to master, cherry-picked to ignite-2.5.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thank you, Andrey!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:46 PM, Andrey Gura <agura@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Pavel,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> issue is targeted to release 2.5 now. Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:40 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> >>>>>>>> ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> There is an unpleasant bug in .NET [1]:
> >>>>>>>>> Services do not work at all on .NET Core and sometimes
on classic
> >>>>>>>>> .NET.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm almost done with the fix and I think we should
include it in
> >>>>>>>>> 2.5.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Users
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> are complaining [2].
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8434
> >>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Re-
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Service-Grid-and-net-core-2-td21318.html
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Vladimir Ozerov
<
> >>>>>>>>> vozerov@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andrey,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I realized that we missed one very important
thing - H2 version
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> upgrade
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1]. This is very important thing because new version
contain
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> optimization
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to IN clause processing. All we need is to upgrade
H2 vesion from
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1.4.196
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to 1.4.197 and re-run tests. Can we target it to
2.5 release?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4150
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Andrey Gura
<agura@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ok, targeted to 2.5. Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Dmitry Pavlov
<
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Andrey,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I saw 1 more proposal in separate topic
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> com/RE-Hi-can-we-squeeze-this-into-2-5-https-issues-apache-
> >>>>>>>>>>> org-jira-browse-IGNITE-8439-td30161.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and 1 proposal here related to ML:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> com/Apache-Ignite-2-5-release-td28927i20.html#a30155
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> but here Yuriy Babak probably should
share his opinion.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 7 мая 2018 г. в 17:09, Andrey
Gura <agura@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey, Dmitry,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've targeted your issues to 2.5
release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:51 PM,
Dmitry Pavlov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did not understand process.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it required to receive someone
reply that issue is agreed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> included
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> into release?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or because there is no response
I can cherry-pick anything
> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.5
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> hoping
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is lazy consensus; no one objected.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 4 мая 2018 г. в 17:44,
Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I got lost. Were all the
bugs reported in this thread fixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> merged
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.5 branch? Is there any
bug which fix is still in
> progress?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just want to know when the
QA and bugs fixing stage is
> over.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:14
AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrey, Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8347
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.5. It is quite
isolated.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Memory leak can be reproduced
if node in embedded mode is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restarted
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same process (thread
is alive and cleanup is not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performed).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> сб, 28 апр. 2018
г. в 19:49, Sergey Chugunov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sergey.chugunov@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to
include into release another critical bug
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper Discovery [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Situation reproducing
the error is very specific and rare
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> leads
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full cluster shut down.
At the same time fix for it very
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simple
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expect it is too
risky.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8421
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 28,
2018 at 6:08 PM Alexei Scherbakov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consider including
this [1] to release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's major usability
issue and if not fixed now will
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lead
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> compatibility
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues in subsequent
release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8418
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 27 апр.
2018 г. в 21:34, Andrey Gura <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agura@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Of course I meant bug fixes, not bugs :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri,
Apr 27, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Andrey Gura <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agura@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Eduard, Pavel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned
bugs are good candidates for including to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Targeted to 2.5.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri,
Apr 27, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Pavel Kovalenko <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jokserfn@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I would like to add this issue
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8405
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2.5
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
2018-04-27 16:59 GMT+03:00 Eduard Shangareev <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eshangareev@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I have finished
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7628.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It looks like a good candidate to merge to 2.5.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ivan.glukos@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dmitriy,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
There are some notes about WAL compaction in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Persistence
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Under
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hood"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> article:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite+
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Persistent+Store+-+under+the+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
hood#IgnitePersistentStore-und
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> erthehood-WALcompaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please take a look - it has all the answers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Best Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ivan Rakov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 27.04.2018 2:28, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Ivan Rakov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ivan.glukos@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I have a fix for a critical issue related to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WAL
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> compaction:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
jira/browse/IGNITE-8393
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In short, if part of WAL archive is broken,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
attempt
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> compress
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result
in spamming warnings in infinite loop.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think it's also worth being included in 2.5
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let's include it, especially given that
the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
fix
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> done.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ivan, on another note, is WAL compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
described
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> anywhere?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
internally to compact WAL and by what factor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
are
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> able
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
reduce
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
file size?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
D.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
--
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Eduard.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
--
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexei Scherbakov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message