ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.5 release
Date Mon, 07 May 2018 19:46:02 GMT
Pavel,

issue is targeted to release 2.5 now. Thanks!

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:40 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org> wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> There is an unpleasant bug in .NET [1]:
> Services do not work at all on .NET Core and sometimes on classic .NET.
>
> I'm almost done with the fix and I think we should include it in 2.5. Users
> are complaining [2].
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8434
> [2]
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Re-Service-Grid-and-net-core-2-td21318.html
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <vozerov@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrey,
>>
>> I realized that we missed one very important thing - H2 version upgrade
>> [1]. This is very important thing because new version contain optimization
>> to IN clause processing. All we need is to upgrade H2 vesion from 1.4.196
>> to 1.4.197 and re-run tests. Can we target it to 2.5 release?
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4150
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Andrey Gura <agura@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Ivan,
>> >
>> > ok, targeted to 2.5. Thanks!
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Thank you, Andrey,
>> > >
>> > > I saw 1 more proposal in separate topic
>> > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > com/RE-Hi-can-we-squeeze-this-into-2-5-https-issues-apache-
>> > org-jira-browse-IGNITE-8439-td30161.html
>> > >
>> > > and 1 proposal here related to ML:
>> > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> > com/Apache-Ignite-2-5-release-td28927i20.html#a30155
>> > > but here Yuriy Babak probably should share his opinion.
>> > >
>> > > Sincerely,
>> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > >
>> > > пн, 7 мая 2018 г. в 17:09, Andrey Gura <agura@apache.org>:
>> > >>
>> > >> Sergey, Dmitry,
>> > >>
>> > >> I've targeted your issues to 2.5 release.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks!
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov.spb@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > I did not understand process.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Is it required to receive someone reply that issue is agreed to
be
>> > >> > included
>> > >> > into release?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Or because there is no response I can cherry-pick anything to
2.5
>> > hoping
>> > >> > it
>> > >> > is lazy consensus; no one objected.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > пт, 4 мая 2018 г. в 17:44, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Igniters,
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I got lost. Were all the bugs reported in this thread fixed
and
>> > merged
>> > >> >> into
>> > >> >> 2.5 branch? Is there any bug which fix is still in progress?
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Just want to know when the QA and bugs fixing stage is over.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> --
>> > >> >> Denis
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <
>> dpavlov.spb@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > >> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > Hi Andrey, Igniters,
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > I propose to include
>> > >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8347
>> > >> >> fix
>> > >> >> > to 2.5. It is quite isolated.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Memory leak can be reproduced if node in embedded mode
is
>> restarted
>> > >> >> > under
>> > >> >> > the same process (thread is alive and cleanup is not
performed).
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > Sincerely,
>> > >> >> > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > сб, 28 апр. 2018 г. в 19:49, Sergey Chugunov
>> > >> >> > <sergey.chugunov@gmail.com
>> > >> >> >:
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > > Igniters,
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > I would like to include into release another critical
bug found
>> > in
>> > >> >> > > ZooKeeper Discovery [1].
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > Situation reproducing the error is very specific
and rare but
>> it
>> > >> >> > > leads
>> > >> >> to
>> > >> >> > > full cluster shut down. At the same time fix for
it very simple
>> > and
>> > >> >> > > I
>> > >> >> > don't
>> > >> >> > > expect it is too risky.
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8421
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:08 PM Alexei Scherbakov
<
>> > >> >> > > alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> > > > Guys,
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > Consider including this [1] to release.
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > It's major usability issue and if not fixed
now will lead to
>> > >> >> > > compatibility
>> > >> >> > > > issues in subsequent release.
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8418
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > пт, 27 апр. 2018 г. в 21:34, Andrey
Gura <agura@apache.org>:
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > Of course I meant bug fixes, not bugs
:)
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:28 PM, Andrey
Gura <
>> > agura@apache.org>
>> > >> >> > wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > > > Eduard, Pavel,
>> > >> >> > > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > > mentioned bugs are good candidates
for including to
>> > release.
>> > >> >> > > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > > Targeted to 2.5.
>> > >> >> > > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >> >> > > > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 5:06 PM,
Pavel Kovalenko <
>> > >> >> > jokserfn@gmail.com
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > > >> Igniters,
>> > >> >> > > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >> I would like to add this issue
>> > >> >> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8405
to
>> 2.5
>> > >> >> > > > > >> scope.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >> 2018-04-27 16:59 GMT+03:00 Eduard
Shangareev <
>> > >> >> > > > eshangareev@gridgain.com
>> > >> >> > > > > >:
>> > >> >> > > > > >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> Guys,
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> I have finished
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7628.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> It looks like a good candidate
to merge to 2.5.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:32
PM, Ivan Rakov <
>> > >> >> > ivan.glukos@gmail.com
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > Dmitriy,
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > There are some notes
about WAL compaction in
>> > "Persistence
>> > >> >> Under
>> > >> >> > > the
>> > >> >> > > > > Hood"
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > article:
>> > >> >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Ignite+
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > Persistent+Store+-+under+the+
>> > hood#IgnitePersistentStore-und
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > erthehood-WALcompaction
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > Please take a look -
it has all the answers.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > Best Regards,
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > Ivan Rakov
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> > On 27.04.2018 2:28,
Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> On Fri, Apr 27,
2018 at 6:38 AM, Ivan Rakov <
>> > >> >> > > > ivan.glukos@gmail.com>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> wrote:
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> Folks,
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> I have a fix
for a critical issue related to WAL
>> > >> >> compaction:
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8393
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> In short, if
part of WAL archive is broken, attempt
>> > to
>> > >> >> > compress
>> > >> >> > > > it
>> > >> >> > > > > may
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> result in spamming
warnings in infinite loop.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> I think it's
also worth being included in 2.5
>> > release.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> Let's include
it, especially given that the fix is
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>> done.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> Ivan, on another
note, is WAL compaction described
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> anywhere?
>> > >> >> > > What
>> > >> >> > > > > do we
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> do
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> internally to compact
WAL and by what factor are we
>> > able
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> to
>> > >> >> > > reduce
>> > >> >> > > > > the
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> WAL
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> file size?
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >> D.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> >
>> > >> >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> --
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> Best regards,
>> > >> >> > > > > >>> Eduard.
>> > >> >> > > > > >>>
>> > >> >> > > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > --
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > > > Best regards,
>> > >> >> > > > Alexei Scherbakov
>> > >> >> > > >
>> > >> >> > >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message