ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Proposed Release: 2.7.7 = 2.7.6 + ML + extra fixed bugs
Date Thu, 19 Sep 2019 15:56:09 GMT
Alexey, Denis,

I've always thought that we are living in a paradigm that `the master
branch is the release ready branch`. Don't we? If so, then we should
take additional attention to commits we make, because it's true that
we have some `blocker` release issues in the master branch. I also
think all these issues are solvable and 2+ months is more than enough
to fix them. Am I missing something?

I'm +1 for 2.8 release. We should not hold the master branch for years.

On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 17:52, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw.sin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No objection from my side if somebody could say that master is ready or
> will be ready to release in a few months
>
> чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 14:21, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org>:
>
> > +1 for 2.8 from me
> >
> > Scope:
> >
> > * master fixes
> > * ML improvements
> > * IEP-35: Metric + System views.
> >
> >
> >
> > В Чт, 19/09/2019 в 14:14 +0300, Pavel Tupitsyn пишет:
> > > +1 for 2.8
> > >
> > > We should not hold master anymore, it has been a year already.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:42 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like both options 2.7.7 & 2.8 both have their benefits.
> > > >
> > > > But someday we will anyway need to release master state. Let's not
> > freeze
> > > > master for years as Zookeeper did with 3.0.
> > > >
> > > > So I like option with 2.8 release more.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > >
> > > > чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 01:42, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Igniters,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2.8 release cycle can last for many months due to a number of issues
> > and
> > > > > regressions we need to address. It can easily slip to the next year,
> > > > > especially considering the holiday season. An alternate solution
can
> > be a
> > > > > series of Ignite 2.7.x releases that are becoming more hardened with
> > each
> > > > > version and go with a small and manageable changeset. For instance,
> > ML
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > > > Thin Clients optimizations with fixes for newly discovered critical
> > > >
> > > > issues
> > > > > can be released in 2.7.7 and 2.7.8.
> > > > >
> > > > > As for 2.8, what exactly are we planning to release there?
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > Denis
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:43 AM Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Start of December for 2.8 sounds good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 13:38 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет:
> > > > > > > Sounds good for me, I will be ready to release ML module
till 1
> > > > >
> > > > > December
> > > > > > > (end of September is not appropriate for ML module due
to known
> > > >
> > > > issues
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > bugs)
> > > > > > > If the whole Ignite could be released to this date I will
be
> > happy in
> > > > > > > another case I suggest the minor release by the formula
mentioned
> > > > >
> > > > > above.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Let's ask another module maintainers here?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ср, 18 сент. 2019 г. в 13:00, Maxim Muzafarov <mmuzaf@apache.org
> > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Agree, we should start a discussion about releasing
Apache
> > Ignite
> > > >
> > > > 2.8
> > > > > > > > version right after 2.7.6 will be announced.
> > > > > > > > Am I missing something?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 12:33, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > nizhikov@apache.org
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > of 2.7 release
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's 2.8, of course. Sorry, for typo.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 12:36 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov
пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > Hello, Alexey
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > we have no chance to
> > > > > > > > > > > release the whole master branch
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Why do you think so?
> > > > > > > > > > From my point of view, we should start discussion
of 2.7
> > > >
> > > > release,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > shortly(end of September of similar)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 12:04 +0300, Alexey
Zinoviev пишет:
> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Igniters, for the whole year I'm
waiting for the
> > next
> > > > > >
> > > > > > release of
> > > > > > > > > > > Apache Ignite with number 2.8 or 3.0.
As I understand we
> > have
> > > > >
> > > > > no
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > chance to
> > > > > > > > > > > release the whole master branch, but
we have cool
> > changes in
> > > >
> > > > ML
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > component
> > > > > > > > > > > that were not released since 2.7 (Nomember
2018).
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm ready to become a release manager
of the special
> > release
> > > > >
> > > > > with
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > the taste
> > > > > > > > > > > of new ML by the formula: 2.7.6 plus
new ML plus all
> > known
> > > > >
> > > > > fixed
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > issues for
> > > > > > > > > > > 2.7.6 release.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Reason: ML has a limited dependency
on core/sql
> > component and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > delivered without major changes in
2.7.6
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I hope to found the support from the
community side and
> > maybe
> > > > >
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > deliver
> > > > > > > > > > > another components like Thin Clients,
Spark integration
> > and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > another
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ready
> > > > > > > > > > > component without strong ties with
core component in the
> > > >
> > > > future
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > according
> > > > > > > > > > > this way (in release 2.7.9 for example)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What do you think, Igniters?
> >

Mime
View raw message