ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Data consistency essentials explained
Date Sat, 30 Nov 2019 14:22:15 GMT
Alexei,

> Ivan, the link is intentional.

Could you please elaborate why is it fine to have a such link? The
referred document is out of community control. Do not we have a
similar one in Ignite documentation? Should we discuss it in another
mail thread?

сб, 30 нояб. 2019 г. в 15:48, Alexei Scherbakov <alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com>:
>
> Ivan, the link is intentional.
>
> Nikolai, the formatting looks ok to me. Feel free to change it however you
> like.
>
> чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 09:53, Николай Ижиков <nizhikov@apache.org>:
>
> > Hello, Alex.
> >
> > I think we should improve article formatting - code highlight, fonts, etc.
> >
> > For now, it’s very hard to read it.
> >
> > Can you, please, do it?
> >
> > > 28 нояб. 2019 г., в 09:25, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo100@gmail.com>
> > написал(а):
> > >
> > > Alexei,
> > >
> > > Many thanks for that article! Really nice that now we have a document
> > > describing Ignite approach for data consistency. I think it is super
> > > important because it is not trivial and very Ignite specific. I
> > > believe lots of Ignite developers will learn something new from this
> > > document.
> > >
> > > By the way, I noticed a link to GridGain documentation [1]. Is it fine?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > https://www.gridgain.com/docs/latest/developers-guide/key-value-api/transactions#pessimistic-transactions
> > >
> > > чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:49, Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >> Alex,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks a lot for putting your knowledge on paper. That's an invaluable
> > contribution!
> > >>
> > >> Looping in the user community (will be interesting for those who use
> > native persistence) and has just spread the word via Ignite twitter handle:
> > >> https://twitter.com/ApacheIgnite/status/1199837055007612928
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> Denis
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alexei Scherbakov <
> > alexey.scherbakoff@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Igniters,
> > >>>
> > >>> As a final action in my almost year long effort in repairing data
> > >>> consistency related issues for transactional persistent caches I've
> > >>> prepared an article explaining the principles of achieving the
> > consistency
> > >>> between partition copies for these scenarios [1]
> > >>> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
> > >>> I plan to keep the article in actual state if something will change
in
> > this
> > >>> area in the future.
> > >>> Fixes were mostly done under IGNITE-10780 and several follow-up fixes.
> > >>>
> > >>> There is still work to be done. Currently I'm working on similar issue
> > for
> > >>> atomic persistent caches [2]. I hope to give an update on that soon.
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Data+consistency
> > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11797
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>> Alexei Scherbakov
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Alexei Scherbakov



-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

Mime
View raw message