ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Release Apache Ignite 2.8.0 RC1
Date Tue, 03 Mar 2020 17:53:18 GMT
Ilya,

I do not want to force the release no matter what happens, but I think
we should release what we have to get feedback not just from the
developer community but from our users too.

And fix all these issues in 2.8.1.

On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 20:33, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Can we please hold back publishing AI-2.8.0-rc1 as public Apache Ignite 2.8
> release?
>
> I have just been notified that
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridCacheColocatedDebugTest#testPutsMultithreadedColocated
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridCacheColocatedDebugTest#testPutsMultithreadedMixed
> are flaky: they seem to deadlock on putAll sorted keys maps. They used to
> pass solidly on 2.7, but fail on master and ignite-2.8.
>
> (They fail around 1 time out of 10, so just run them 25 times to check)
>
> If there is indeed a deadlock, this would become a blocker to this release,
> in my opinion, but I need some time to check.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 11:29, Maxim Muzafarov <mmuzaf@apache.org>:
>
> > Ivan,
> >
> >
> > I agree with you that the more members will check the release the
> > better will be. That's why I've shared the release candidate links [1]
> > before starting a vote. The best time for starting a vote is not
> > mentioned at our release wiki page [2] (should we?) and I've also
> > failed with googling the best practices for it too. So, I've supposed
> > since all of us are working on their own tasks during weekdays the
> > free time on the weekend is the best choice for cheking\voting on the
> > release. Probably this decision was wrong.
> >
> > [1]
> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-8-RELEASE-Time-Scope-Manager-tp43616p46117.html
> > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> >
> > On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 00:37, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo100@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Also I have a comment regarding to voting. Voting for 72 hour spanning
> > > a weekend sounds a little bit odd to me. In a particular case the more
> > > people check the release the better. And I suppose there is more time
> > > for it on weekdays for the majority.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >
> > > вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 00:33, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo100@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a private
> > PMC list
> > > > Cannot understand why it should be discussed on a private list. What
> > > > is the clue?
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >
> > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 16:00, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw.sin@gmail.com
> > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a private
> > PMC
> > > > > list
> > > > >
> > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 15:12 Ilya Kasnacheev <
> > ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As far as my understanding goes, ignite-zookeeper is listed
for
> > removal
> > > > > > because it brings a lot of dependencies, some of which may have
> > known
> > > > > > vulnerabilities, which will make the distribution also considered
> > > > > > vulnerable by some scanners.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Alexey Zinoviev <
> > zaleslaw.sin@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could
be
> > form by
> > > > > > > voting on user-list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 9:55 Alexey Goncharuk <
> > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com
> > > > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nikolay, Alexey,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > First, the idea of the slim binary release and docker
image was
> > > > > > discussed
> > > > > > > > openly on the dev-list [1]. Second, nobody talks about
> > removing these
> > > > > > > > modules from the product. The idea was to create an
additional
> > > > > > > distribution
> > > > > > > > which is much lighter than the current full package
to reduce
> > the size
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > the downloadable artifact and reduce the number of
potential
> > > > > > > > vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The list of modules was chosen subjectively by the
number of
> > questions
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > the user-list, number third-party libraries (size)
and
> > vulnerabilities
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > module brings. Given that there are still questions,
we are
> > definitely
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > ready to release it in 2.8.0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Let's move discussion to the original thread?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Slim-binary-release-and-docker-image-for-Apache-Ignite-td45110.html
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> >

Mime
View raw message