ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Missed (non-suited) tests
Date Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:43:50 GMT
Hello!

What do you mean by "adding ignite-core to suite"? ignite-core is a top
dependency and its tests are also included in all other modules' tests
classpath since it provides GridAbstractTest.

Regards,
-- 
Ilya Kasnacheev


пт, 27 нояб. 2020 г. в 01:24, Max Timonin <timonin.maxim@gmail.com>:

> Hi, Ilya!
>
> So, I've updated PR, fixed comments and removed Core* prefixes. MTCGA shows
> no blockers, but it was 2 weeks ago, so I've started it again.
>
> If PR is OK then there are some suites that should be updated on TC. Could
> you please tell me how we can do it?
>
> 1. Add ignite-cassandra-serializers suite:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.tests.SerializerSuite
>
> 2. Add ignite-core to Queries* TC suite:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.client.IgniteClientTestSuite
>    2. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite
>    3. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite2
>    4. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite3
>    5. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite4
>    6. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite5
>    7. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite6
>    8. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgnitePdsWithIndexingCoreTestSuite
>    9. org.apache.ignite.suites.IgniteCacheMvccSqlTestSuite
>
> 3. Remove ignite-indexing from TC suites:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite3
>    2. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite4
>    3. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite5
>
> 4. Add ignite-core to Spring* TC suite:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.IgniteSpringTestSuite
>
> 5. Add ignite-core suite (depends on uri-deployment module):
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.IgniteUriDeploymentTestSuite
>
> 6. Add ignite-core suite to Zookeeper TC suite:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.ZookeeperDiscoverySpiTestSuite3
>
> 7. Remove ignite-zookeeper test suite:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.testsuites.ZookeeperDiscoverySpiTestSuite3
>
> 8. Add ignite-ml test suites:
>
>    1. org.apache.ignite.ml.math.distances.DistancesTestSuite
>    2. org.apache.ignite.ml.naivebayes.NaiveBayesTestSuite
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 4:26 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > Yes, we have such tests which depend on ignite-indexing or ignite-spring.
> > They just need to be included in Spring* or Queries* test suite. Then
> they
> > will be executed on TC in the correct context. You can also run these
> tests
> > from IDEA by specifying other module as classpath. No need to move the
> > classes around.
> >
> > I will check the PR.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Ilya Kasnacheev
> >
> >
> > ср, 25 нояб. 2020 г. в 00:22, Max Timonin <timonin.maxim@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Ilya, Anton, Ivan, hi!
> > >
> > > I fix some comments you leave in the PR. Also I checked some test
> suites
> > > and found that some tests are written in the core module but depend on
> > the
> > > indexing module (or other modules). Some of such test classes contain
> > tests
> > > that are related to the core functionality, but some to indexing. I'm
> not
> > > sure if it is correct to move a whole suite with all tests from the
> > > indexing module to the core, as it will hide some core tests from the
> > core
> > > module.
> > >
> > > I believe that the correct solution is to investigate every such test
> and
> > > move it to the right module. But I think this work will take a lot of
> > time
> > > and should be performed in a separate ticket, I will do it in the
> > > background.
> > >
> > > I think currently we should proceed with a way I introduced in PR:
> > > 1. Create fake suites for all such tests (written in core, suited in
> > other
> > > modules: indexing/spring/zookeeper/etc) in the core module. I named
> such
> > > suites with prefix Core*.
> > > 2. Replace tests in modules with links to fake suites.
> > > 3. Create an umbrella Jira ticket to discover every fake suite and
> > replace
> > > it with a new one in the right module.
> > > 4. Merge this PR for introducing a new travis check to avoid losing
> > > new tests.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > List of such mixed suites:
> > >
> > > 1. suite IgniteBinaryCacheQueryTestSuite
> > >
> > > test GridCacheQueryIndexingDisabledSelfTest
> > > test IgniteCacheBinaryObjectsScanSelfTest
> > > test IgniteCacheBinaryObjectsScanWithEventsSelfTest)
> > >
> > >
> > > 2. suite IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite3
> > >
> > > test GridCacheContinuousQueryNodesFilteringTest
> > >
> > >
> > > 3. suite IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite5
> > >
> > > test ContinuousQueryRemoteFilterMissingInClassPathSelfTest
> > >
> > > 4. suite IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite6
> > >
> > > test CacheContinuousQueryOperationP2PTest
> > >
> > > test CacheContinuousQueryFilterDeploymentFailedTest
> > >
> > >
> > > 5. all tests in suite IgnitePdsWithIndexingCoreTestSuite
> > >
> > >
> > > 6. and some others.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:38 PM Max Timonin <timonin.maxim@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ilya! Thank you for up the topic. I will come back with fixes and
> > > > comments in a couple of days.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 4:26 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <
> > > ilya.kasnacheev@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello!
> > > >>
> > > >> I have left some comments and there's also more discussion there.
> Can
> > > you
> > > >> please look?
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> --
> > > >> Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> вт, 3 нояб. 2020 г. в 00:03, Max Timonin <timonin.maxim@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've updated PR: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8367.
> Anton,
> > > >> Ivan,
> > > >> > Ivan could you please review it?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Some moments to mention:
> > > >> > 1. I've added new suites: SerializerSuite
> > > >> (ignite-cassandra-serializers),
> > > >> > DistanceTestSuite, NaiveBayesTestSuite (ignite-ml). Should we
> > > configure
> > > >> a
> > > >> > TeamCity to run them?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2. Some tests marked as failed, I'll create corresponding tickets
> > for
> > > >> them
> > > >> > after PR approved:
> > > >> > - IgnitePKIndexesMigrationToUnwrapPkTest
> > > >> > - P2PGridifySelfTest
> > > >> > - GridCacheMultithreadedFailoverAbstractTest
> > > >> > - WalCompactionAfterRestartTest
> > > >> > - GridTcpCommunicationSpiLogTest
> > > >> > - ComplexSecondaryKeyUnwrapSelfTest
> > > >> > - SqlTransactionsSelfTest
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 3. Add docs to DEVNOTES.txt
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:44 AM Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > As I understand we
> > > >> > > > can't just move suites between modules, as TeamCity
may depend
> > on
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > path
> > > >> > > > to them.
> > > >> > > See no problem to update TC as well.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:32 PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> > > ivandasch@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > I suggests to mark these tests with @Ignore and file
tickets
> to
> > > fix
> > > >> > them.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > пт, 30 окт. 2020 г. в 16:26, Ivan Daschinsky
<
> > ivandasch@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > Hi
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > WalCompactionAfterRestartTest -- yes we need it.
This test
> > > failed
> > > >> > > because
> > > >> > > > > of race (test shold be rewritten a little bit)
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > пт, 30 окт. 2020 г. в 16:15, Max Timonin
<
> > > timonin.maxim@gmail.com
> > > >> >:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >> Hi!
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Yes, you're correct. I've developed the check
and started
> to
> > > >> clean
> > > >> > > tests
> > > >> > > > >> (move them to suites, mark some tests with
Ignore, etc.). I
> > > >> finish
> > > >> > > work
> > > >> > > > on
> > > >> > > > >> the core module. I hope it was the biggest
one, and others
> > are
> > > >> less.
> > > >> > > If
> > > >> > > > >> so,
> > > >> > > > >> I think I will finish the work on other modules
in 1 or 2
> > > weeks,
> > > >> as
> > > >> > I
> > > >> > > do
> > > >> > > > >> this activity in the background (~10% of my
work time).
> > > Actually
> > > >> > I've
> > > >> > > > >> found
> > > >> > > > >> 3 failed tests in the core module that aren't
in any suite,
> > so
> > > I
> > > >> > need
> > > >> > > > time
> > > >> > > > >> to discover reason of failures and if we actually
need
> those
> > > >> tests:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> GridCacheMultithreadedFailoverAbstractTest
> > > >> > > > >> WalCompactionAfterRestartTest
> > > >> > > > >> GridTcpCommunicationSpiLogTest
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> Also we should decide how to be with wrongly
located es.
> As I
> > > >> > > understand
> > > >> > > > >> we
> > > >> > > > >> can't just move suites between modules, as
TeamCity may
> > depend
> > > on
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > path
> > > >> > > > >> to them. So, for such cases I've just created
suites in the
> > > right
> > > >> > > > module,
> > > >> > > > >> and replaced the test list with the new class
suite. It
> does
> > > not
> > > >> > look
> > > >> > > > >> pretty enough, but I think It's a path of
least resistance.
> > > WDYT?
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> BEFORE:
> > > >> > > > >> Module A -> SuiteA -> testA1, testA2,
testB1, testB2
> > > >> > > > >> Module B -> testB1, testB2
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> AFTER:
> > > >> > > > >> Module A -> SuiteA, SuiteB
> > > >> > > > >> Module B -> SuiteB -> testB1, testB2
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 3:38 PM Anton Vinogradov
<
> > > av@apache.org>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > Folks,
> > > >> > > > >> > What's the current state of this thread?
> > > >> > > > >> > AFAIU, we found unused and wrongly located
tests and
> > > developed
> > > >> > some
> > > >> > > > >> > checker, could we split this to some
PRs?
> > > >> > > > >> > Let's merge tests usage fix and location
fixes first,
> this
> > > will
> > > >> > > > provide
> > > >> > > > >> us
> > > >> > > > >> > an ability to automate check using Travis.
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 12:06 PM Ivan
Pavlukhin <
> > > >> > > vololo100@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > Max, Ivan,
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > Using explicit @Ignore and the automated
check sounds
> > good
> > > to
> > > >> > me.
> > > >> > > If
> > > >> > > > >> > > nobody has arguments against it
I think we should do
> it.
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > 2020-10-19 19:30 GMT+03:00, Max
Timonin <
> > > >> > timonin.maxim@gmail.com
> > > >> > > >:
> > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Ivan,
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > > I've checked the ticket you
provide. It contains
> > subtasks
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > > >> uncomment
> > > >> > > > >> > or
> > > >> > > > >> > > > to remove some unused tests.
It definitely describes
> > some
> > > >> > cases
> > > >> > > > I've
> > > >> > > > >> > > found.
> > > >> > > > >> > > > So what do you think if I uncomment
them in suites,
> add
> > > >> > @Ignore
> > > >> > > > >> > > annotation
> > > >> > > > >> > > > for those tests while the tickets
are open? This will
> > > help
> > > >> to
> > > >> > > find
> > > >> > > > >> out
> > > >> > > > >> > > > tests that were forgiven in
a recent time.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > > Also I believe that this check
must be automated. I
> > > didn't
> > > >> > find
> > > >> > > a
> > > >> > > > >> way
> > > >> > > > >> > how
> > > >> > > > >> > > > uncomment / unused tests are
found in the ticket. If
> > > there
> > > >> is
> > > >> > no
> > > >> > > > >> any -
> > > >> > > > >> > I
> > > >> > > > >> > > > propose mine PR for this purpose.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 5:24
PM Ivan Daschinsky <
> > > >> > > > >> ivandasch@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Ivan, as far as I understand,
Max also created
> > > >> verification
> > > >> > > check
> > > >> > > > >> for
> > > >> > > > >> > > not
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> included test and found
a few tests, that have never
> > > been
> > > >> > > > included
> > > >> > > > >> in
> > > >> > > > >> > > any
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> testsuites.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Also, I suppose, that even
if we cannot run some
> > tests,
> > > >> these
> > > >> > > > tests
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> should
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> be ignored using annotation,
but not commented.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> пн, 19 окт. 2020 г.
в 16:33, Ivan Pavlukhin <
> > > >> > > vololo100@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Hi Max,
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > There is an existing
effort about "abandoned"
> tests
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9210
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > 2020-10-19 16:25 GMT+03:00,
Max Timonin <
> > > >> > > > timonin.maxim@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > >> >:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Hi Igniters!
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > I made a research
into tests that aren't
> included
> > in
> > > >> any
> > > >> > > test
> > > >> > > > >> > suite.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > As
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > TeamCity runs
tests by suites so there could be
> > > tests
> > > >> > that
> > > >> > > > >> never
> > > >> > > > >> > run
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > on
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > TC.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > So I tried implementing
a simple check for such
> > > tests
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > > >> include
> > > >> > > > >> > it
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > in
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Ignite's travis
config.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > The check runs
while "mvn test" command and
> > > >> piggy-backs
> > > >> > on
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > >> > maven
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > surefire plugin.
I replaced the junit provider
> > with
> > > a
> > > >> > > custom
> > > >> > > > >> one
> > > >> > > > >> > > that
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > checks if a class
is a test or a suite (there
> are
> > > some
> > > >> > > Ignite
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > specific
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > stuff), marks
tests that are in suites and
> raises
> > an
> > > >> > > > exception
> > > >> > > > >> if
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > there
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > are
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > non-suited tests.
It's implemented as a part of
> > > maven
> > > >> > > command
> > > >> > > > >> so
> > > >> > > > >> > it
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> runs
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > for every module
separately.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > I've prepared
draft PR with this check:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8367
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Travis check
report is here:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/ignite/jobs/737046387
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > As It's a draft,
so I skip some maven
> > configuration
> > > >> steps
> > > >> > > > for a
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > while.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Also
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > I run the check
only for the core module.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > But I have some
results that want to discuss
> > before
> > > >> > > continue
> > > >> > > > >> the
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > work:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 1. Currently
in the core module there are 53
> tests
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > > aren't
> > > >> > > > >> > part
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > of
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > any
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > test suite. I'm
not sure about the reason for
> > every
> > > >> test.
> > > >> > > So
> > > >> > > > I
> > > >> > > > >> > just
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > put
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > below a list
of the tests and last contributor
> to
> > a
> > > >> file
> > > >> > > that
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > contains
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> a
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > test.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 2. Some tests
are located in the core module,
> but
> > > >> suites
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > > >> in a
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > different, for
example ignite-indexing suite
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > IgniteCacheQuerySelfTestSuite3
contains
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > only tests written
in the core module, and none
> > from
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > >> indexing
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> module.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Also there are
suites in spring, uri-deploy,
> > > zookeeper
> > > >> > > > >> modules. In
> > > >> > > > >> > > my
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> PR
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > I've just copied
the test suites to the core
> > module.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 3. Some test
classes are named with the
> "Abstract"
> > > >> suffix
> > > >> > > but
> > > >> > > > >> > don't
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> have
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > the corresponding
modifier (for example,
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > IgniteTxTimeoutAbstractTest).
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > So,
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > I add the modifier
for every such file if it's
> > not a
> > > >> part
> > > >> > > of
> > > >> > > > >> any
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > suite.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > What do you think
about this check? If Ignite
> > needs
> > > >> it,
> > > >> > > let's
> > > >> > > > >> > > discuss
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > next
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > things:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 1. Mark tests
that should never be in any suite
> by
> > > >> some
> > > >> > > > reason;
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 2. Fix the missed
tests;
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 3. How to declare
suites that contains tests
> from
> > a
> > > >> > > different
> > > >> > > > >> > > module;
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > 4. How to check
if TC runs all suites.
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > List of non-suited
tests in the core module:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > maksim.stepachev@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridTcpCommunicationSpiLogTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > nizhikov@apache.org:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >>  IgniteCacheClientMultiNodeUpdateTopologyLockTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         CacheClientsConcurrentStartTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteOutOfMemoryPropagationTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheP2PUndeploySelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheRebalancingOrderingTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteMassLoadSandboxTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         PageLockTrackerMXBeanImplTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
>  IgniteBinaryMetadataUpdateNodeRestartTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         CacheLockCandidatesThreadTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridMBeanBaselineTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
>  RendezvousAffinityFunctionSimpleBenchmark
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > samvimes@yandex.ru:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgnitePdsNoSpaceLeftOnDeviceTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > maxmuzaf@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheOnCopyFlagReplicatedSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheOnCopyFlagLocalSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >>  GridCacheReplicatedAtomicReferenceMultiNodeTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheReplicatedMarshallerTxTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheReplicatedTxConcurrentGetTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheOnCopyFlagTxPartitionedSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheReplicatedTxReadTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >>  GridCachePartitionedAtomicReferenceMultiNodeTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheOnCopyFlagAtomicSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > mmuzaf@apache.org:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridActivateExtensionTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteChangeGlobalStateCacheTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteChangeGlobalStateTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteChangeGlobalStateServiceTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteChangeGlobalStateDataStructureTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > oignatenko@gridgain.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         CacheEntryProcessorCopySelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         MemoryLeaksOnRestartNodeTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheAtomicPreloadSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         WalCompactionAfterRestartTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteCacheConcurrentPutGetRemove
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridIoManagerBenchmark0
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > nsamelchev@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > >  GridLongRunningInitNewCrdFutureDiagnosticsTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
>  GridCacheMultithreadedFailoverAbstractTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > alexey.goncharuk@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
>  GridCacheBinaryObjectsAtomicOnheapSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > >  GridCacheBinaryObjectsAtomicNearDisabledOnheapSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >>  GridCacheBinaryObjectsPartitionedOnheapSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > GridCacheBinaryObjectsPartitionedNearDisabledOnheapSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > vladisavj@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgnitePartitionedLockSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > alexandr.belyak@xored.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> >  IgniteStableBaselineCachePutAllFailoverTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> >  IgniteStableBaselineCacheRemoveFailoverTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > ilantukh@gridgain.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteCacheAtomicOnheapExpiryPolicyTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> >  IgniteCacheAtomicLocalOnheapExpiryPolicyTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheReplicatedOnheapFullApiSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
>  GridCacheBinaryObjectsLocalOnheapSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > oignatenko@users.noreply.github.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         GridCacheTtlManagerEvictionSelfTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > irakov@apache.org:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         CommonPoolStarvationCheckpointTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > alievmirza@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         RemoveAllDeadlockTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > schugunov@gridgain.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         FullyConnectedComponentSearcherTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > sboikov@gridgain.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         IgniteDataStructuresNoClassOnServerTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > timonin.maxim@gmail.com:
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >         ReliableChannelTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
>  ThinClientPartitionAwarenessDiscoveryTest
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > --
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> --
> > > >> > > > >> > > >> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > > >> > > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > >> > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > --
> > > >> > > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message