ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Define Apache Ignite as a Distributed Database
Date Tue, 01 Dec 2020 00:06:05 GMT
The vote is closed with results shared in a separate email:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/RESULT-VOTE-Define-Apache-Ignite-as-a-Distributed-Database-td50391.html

Thanks to everyone who cast the vote!

@Stephen Darlington <stephen.darlington@gridgain.com>, your point about the
compute APIs importance is valid. Those capabilities will be featured at
the top of the main page. I'll draft a text for that section
(High-Performance Compute Cluster) and will appreciate if you share your
thoughts in this ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13780

-
Denis


On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 1:34 AM Stephen Darlington <
stephen.darlington@gridgain.com> wrote:

> -1
>
> I think the compute APIs are an important part of Ignite’s value. Calling
> it a database diminishes that in my opinion.
>
> > On 24 Nov 2020, at 08:40, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo100@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > 2020-11-24 11:33 GMT+03:00, Anton Vinogradov <av@apache.org>:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:24 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 3:25 AM Saikat Maitra <saikat.maitra@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:55 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> >>>> valentin.kulichenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 2:44 PM Denis Magda <dmagda@apache.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With this vote, I'd like to formally wrap up our discussion
on
> >>> defining
> >>>>>> Ignite as a "distributed database" instead of an "in-memory
> >>> computing"
> >>>>>> platform. See the following discussion for the rationale and
> >>>>>> context:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Renaming-Ignite-s-product-category-td49246.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If the vote passes, the website will define Ignite as "a
> >>>>>> distributed
> >>>>>> database for in-memory speed at petabyte scale" to underscore
our
> >>>>> in-memory
> >>>>>> origins (and the primary reason why the project is selected)
but
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>> diminishing our persistence capabilities. All prominent use
cases
> >>> such
> >>>> as
> >>>>>> caching, high-performance computing, etc. will remain visible
on
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> website. There is nothing wrong if a distributed database is
used
> >>>>>> as
> >>> a
> >>>>>> cache or high-performance compute cluster; it's up to an
> >>>>>> application
> >>>>>> developer to decide.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Overall, please cast your vote for defining Ignite as a
> >>>>>> "distributed
> >>>>>> database":
> >>>>>> +1 - support the change
> >>>>>> -1 - disagree with the change, explain why
> >>>>>> 0 - neutral
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is a majority vote that is open for the next 7 days and
to be
> >>>> closed
> >>>>>> on Monday, Nov 30th:
> >>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?year=2020&month=11&day=30
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Ivan Pavlukhin
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message