ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.11
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2021 13:43:54 GMT
Nikita,

What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles
describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why
should we remove them?

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky <ivandasch@gmail.com>:

> Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some
> mistakes in this article)
>
> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky <ivandasch@gmail.com>:
>
> > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> >
> > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10
> >
> > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2011@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi guys!
> >>
> >> Sorry, totally missed this email.
> >>
> >> I can do this right away.
> >>
> >> Just a couple of questions first:
> >>
> >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
> >> articles:
> >>
> >> Thin Clients
> >> Thin Clients Overview
> >> Java Thin Client
> >> .NET Thin Client
> >> C++ Thin Client
> >> Python Thin Client
> >> PHP Thin Client
> >> Node.js Thin Client
> >> Binary Client Protocol
> >>
> >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one)
> >> should
> >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary
> Client
> >> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
> >> What do you think about this?
> >>
> >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to
> the
> >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
> >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin
> >> clients'
> >> introduction article.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Nikita
> >>
> >>
> >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov <olive.crow@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> > Hi, Nikita!
> >> >
> >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how we
> >> can
> >> > start with it?
> >> >
> >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2011@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > Hello Igniters!
> >> > >
> >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
> >> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
> >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to
> >> document.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Nikita
> >> > >
> >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049226@163.com>:
> >> > >
> >> > > > hello,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it
is a
> >> > > > valuable one.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
> >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account
> >> integration
> >> > for
> >> > > > non-committers?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > For the page
> >> > > > >
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
> >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not
> >> sufficient.
> >> > Can
> >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his
> own?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin <timonin.maxim@gmail.com
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad
to hear
> >> there
> >> > are
> >> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it.
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov <
> dpavlov@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there
is a
> >> chance ))
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin <
> timonin.maxim@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends
on readiness.
> I
> >> > guess
> >> > > > if
> >> > > > >>> it
> >> > > > >>>> is not in the master, we can skip and release
it next time.
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review.
I'm OK to release
> >> it
> >> > > > within
> >> > > > >>> the
> >> > > > >>>> next release.
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov
<
> >> dpavlov@apache.org>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Hi Alexey,
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Releasing master as-is makes sence for me.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends
on readiness.
> I
> >> > guess
> >> > > > if
> >> > > > >>> it
> >> > > > >>>>> is not in the master, we can skip and release
it next time.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze
date. It's not a
> big
> >> > deal,
> >> > > > but
> >> > > > >>>>> still makes sense to start discussion, create
and share wiki
> >> > page and
> >> > > > >>>>> create branch.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Since committer privileges required to create
branch, could
> >> you
> >> > > > please
> >> > > > >>>>> notify me in advance.
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> Sincerely,
> >> > > > >>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >> > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>> On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��������������
���������������� <
> >> > > > >>>>> olive.crow@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>> :scope:
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i
picked for Apache
> Ignite
> >> > 2.11
> >> > > > >>>>> release
> >> > > > >>>>>> Let's start discussion
> >> > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>> [1]
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >> > > > >>>>>> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov
<dpavlov@apache.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Alexey,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> :pmc to sign distribution:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Formally, only PMC member can be
a release manager, so
> part
> >> of
> >> > > > >>>>> activities should be picked up by committer
and PMC member.
> If
> >> > noone
> >> > > > >>> else
> >> > > > >>>>> want to help you here, I would.
> >> > > > >>>>>>> :timeline:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> And, could you estimate all phases
of the release.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> :scope:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> I guess we can just pick up master
current state and
> release
> >> > it.
> >> > > > >>> But
> >> > > > >>>>> if someone has some ideas if we should wait
for particular
> >> > feature to
> >> > > > >>> be
> >> > > > >>>>> completed before branch divergence/release
candidate build,
> >> > please
> >> > > > let
> >> > > > >>> know.
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely,
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
> >> > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей
Гидаспов <
> >> olive.crow@gmail.com
> >> > >
> >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Dear Ignite Community!
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> I suggest starting Apache Ignite
2.11 release activities.
> >> Also
> >> > > > >>>>> suggest
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> myself to be a release manager
for this release. I plan
> >> > release
> >> > > > >>> at
> >> > > > >>>>> the end
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> of june 2021.
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> ___
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Alexey Gidaspov
> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message