ignite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Ignite 2.11
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2021 14:26:09 GMT
Guys, I've created the following ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15046

Please feel free to comment or edit it.

If there are no objections, I'll create a PR soon.

Regards,
Nikita

чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:54, Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2011@gmail.com>:

> Ivan, thank you for the links!
>
> Well, I can still find the docs on Python Thin Client under the "Thin
> Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" in 2.10:
> https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.10.0/thin-clients/python-thin-client
>
> So, I can replace the contents of  "Thin Сlients"->"Python Thin Client"
> page with a link to the
> https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ and
> a short note as follows:
> "To see the documentation on Python Thin Client, please click here[link to
> the readthedocs.io
> <https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/>].
> +
> And I can also change the link here
> <https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/thin-clients/getting-started-with-thin-clients>
(after
> "Ignite provides the following thin clients:", so that it would lead to the
> readthedocs.io
> <https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/>
>  too).
>
> Alex, my bad, I misread the first question and thought that all the docs
> on thin clients have been migrated to the readthedocs.io
> <https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/>.
> The articles are absolutely OK :)
>
> Regards,
> Nikita
>
> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:44, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.alex@gmail.com>:
>
>> Nikita,
>>
>> What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles
>> describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why
>> should we remove them?
>>
>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky <ivandasch@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some
>>> mistakes in this article)
>>>
>>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky <ivandasch@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
>>> >
>>> > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10
>>> >
>>> > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2011@gmail.com>:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi guys!
>>> >>
>>> >> Sorry, totally missed this email.
>>> >>
>>> >> I can do this right away.
>>> >>
>>> >> Just a couple of questions first:
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following
>>> >> articles:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thin Clients
>>> >> Thin Clients Overview
>>> >> Java Thin Client
>>> >> .NET Thin Client
>>> >> C++ Thin Client
>>> >> Python Thin Client
>>> >> PHP Thin Client
>>> >> Node.js Thin Client
>>> >> Binary Client Protocol
>>> >>
>>> >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one)
>>> >> should
>>> >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary
>>> Client
>>> >> Protocol? Should it remain too?).
>>> >> What do you think about this?
>>> >>
>>> >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to
>>> the
>>> >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it.
>>> >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin
>>> >> clients'
>>> >> introduction article.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> Nikita
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov <olive.crow@gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi, Nikita!
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe
how
>>> we
>>> >> can
>>> >> > start with it?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2011@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > > Hello Igniters!
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work.
>>> >> > > I'll be glad to help with this.
>>> >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need
to
>>> >> document.
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > Regards,
>>> >> > > Nikita
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049226@163.com>:
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > hello,
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into
master?
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I
think it
>>> is a
>>> >> > > > valuable one.
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道:
>>> >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA
account
>>> >> integration
>>> >> > for
>>> >> > > > non-committers?
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > For the page
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11
>>> >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to
be not
>>> >> sufficient.
>>> >> > Can
>>> >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup
on his
>>> own?
>>> >> > > > >
>>> >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin <
>>> timonin.maxim@gmail.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I
am glad to hear
>>> >> there
>>> >> > are
>>> >> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone
it.
>>> >> > > > >>
>>> >> > > > >>
>>> >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov
<
>>> dpavlov@apache.org
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >>
>>> >> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted.
>>> >> > > > >>>
>>> >> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now,
so there is a
>>> >> chance ))
>>> >> > > > >>>
>>> >> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin <
>>> timonin.maxim@gmail.com
>>> >> >
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really
depends on
>>> readiness. I
>>> >> > guess
>>> >> > > > if
>>> >> > > > >>> it
>>> >> > > > >>>> is not in the master, we can skip and
release it next time.
>>> >> > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>> Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on
review. I'm OK to
>>> release
>>> >> it
>>> >> > > > within
>>> >> > > > >>> the
>>> >> > > > >>>> next release.
>>> >> > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry
Pavlov <
>>> >> dpavlov@apache.org>
>>> >> > > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>> >> > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Releasing master as-is makes sence
for me.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really
depends on
>>> readiness. I
>>> >> > guess
>>> >> > > > if
>>> >> > > > >>> it
>>> >> > > > >>>>> is not in the master, we can skip
and release it next
>>> time.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> We've a bit overdue initial scope
freeze date. It's not a
>>> big
>>> >> > deal,
>>> >> > > > but
>>> >> > > > >>>>> still makes sense to start discussion,
create and share
>>> wiki
>>> >> > page and
>>> >> > > > >>>>> create branch.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Since committer privileges required
to create branch,
>>> could
>>> >> you
>>> >> > > > please
>>> >> > > > >>>>> notify me in advance.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Sincerely,
>>> >> > > > >>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>> >> > > > >>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>> On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, ��������������
���������������� <
>>> >> > > > >>>>> olive.crow@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>> :scope:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets,
i picked for Apache
>>> Ignite
>>> >> > 2.11
>>> >> > > > >>>>> release
>>> >> > > > >>>>>> Let's start discussion
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>> [1]
>>> >> > > > >>>
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>>> >> > > > >>>>>> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry
Pavlov <
>>> dpavlov@apache.org>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Alexey,
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> :pmc to sign distribution:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Formally, only PMC member
can be a release manager, so
>>> part
>>> >> of
>>> >> > > > >>>>> activities should be picked up by
committer and PMC
>>> member. If
>>> >> > noone
>>> >> > > > >>> else
>>> >> > > > >>>>> want to help you here, I would.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> :timeline:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> And, could you estimate
all phases of the release.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> :scope:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> I guess we can just pick
up master current state and
>>> release
>>> >> > it.
>>> >> > > > >>> But
>>> >> > > > >>>>> if someone has some ideas if we
should wait for particular
>>> >> > feature to
>>> >> > > > >>> be
>>> >> > > > >>>>> completed before branch divergence/release
candidate
>>> build,
>>> >> > please
>>> >> > > > let
>>> >> > > > >>> know.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02,
Алексей Гидаспов <
>>> >> olive.crow@gmail.com
>>> >> > >
>>> >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Dear Ignite Community!
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> I suggest starting Apache
Ignite 2.11 release
>>> activities.
>>> >> Also
>>> >> > > > >>>>> suggest
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> myself to be a release
manager for this release. I plan
>>> >> > release
>>> >> > > > >>> at
>>> >> > > > >>>>> the end
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> of june 2021.
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> ___
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Alexey Gidaspov
>>> >> > > > >>>>>>>>
>>> >> > > >
>>> >> > >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message