jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-3213) Improve DocumentStore API
Date Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:12:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14693185#comment-14693185
] 

Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-3213:
---------------------------------------

Looks nice. Why do we need to pass the Collection into DocumentStore.find/findOne/remove()?
Isn't it already available in the Query?

> Improve DocumentStore API
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3213
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3213
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core, mongomk
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>
> The current DocumentStore API needs to be improved to support new requirements, for example
OAK-3001, to avoid "instanceof XYZDocumentStore" in the DocumentNodeStore implementation,
to possibly improve performance, and to make it (more) future-proof.
> * Improved query functionality to support many constraints (currently, DocumentStore.query
only fromKey, toKey, and startValue).
> * Allow query results to not be ordered by key if not needed at the caller side.
> * Maybe support remove with constraints (for OAK-3001).
> * Define if only the whole document is needed, or just the key, or the key plus some
of its properties.
> * Define how old the result can be (is it allowed to return cached documents, how fresh
does the result need to be, is it allowed to return some cached and some new documents).
> * In case of version changes in the data model (additional collections, additional indexes),
allow to work with existing data, possibly without having to upgrade the store (maybe in read-only
mode).
> Documentation might need to be improved to cover the data model as well (list of collections,
list of indexes, possibility of additional indexes), and expected performance characteristics.
> There are some options questions:
> * Should we backport this change (to the 1.0 and / or 1.2 branch)?
> * Should we keep the current API (DocumentStore.query for example)?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message