jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (OAK-3434) Revert backwards-incompatible changes to SecurityProviderImpl
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:46:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902237#comment-14902237
] 

Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3434:
--------------------------------------

Just for the record - From what I know extending OSGi component does not work. So in an OSGi
setup if a customer is extending SecurityProvider I do not see how it worked so far. Assuming
it worked then also its hard to see how it worked as then you would still have 2 security
providers as extending would not cause the first one to be disabled. So it would have been
good to first have a test case which can demonstrate this problamatic scenario and then have
a fix.





> Revert backwards-incompatible changes to SecurityProviderImpl
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3434
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Francesco Mari
>            Assignee: Francesco Mari
>             Fix For: 1.3.7
>
>         Attachments: OAK-3434-01.patch
>
>
> OAK-3201 introduced some backwards-incompatible changes to {{SecurityProviderImpl}}.
It should be investigated if those changes can be reverted to maintain the backwards compatibility
of the {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.security}} package.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message