jackrabbit-oak-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (OAK-5894) IndexDefinitionBuilder shouldn't set type=lucene if type=disabled in existing tree
Date Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:07:32 GMT
Vikas Saurabh created OAK-5894:
----------------------------------

             Summary: IndexDefinitionBuilder shouldn't set type=lucene if type=disabled in
existing tree
                 Key: OAK-5894
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5894
             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: lucene
            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
            Priority: Minor
             Fix For: 1.8


IndexDefinitionBuilder is often used to provision indices in RepositoryInitializer. In current
form, provisioning would lead to setting up type="lucene" (and hence reindex=true as a side-effect)
even if the definition had been marked disabled.

Sure, the provisioning logic can do that check - but the behavior of not setting type=lucene
sounds like a sane default behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message