jakarta-jcs-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Smuts, Aaron" <aaro...@amazon.com>
Subject RE: [Fwd: ReOrg of the Turbine CVS repositories]
Date Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:51:17 GMT
It would help if JCS could be directly under Jakarta.  It was good for us to be in Turbine
at first, but now the project is stable enough to be its own independent project.   

We are also ready for a release, which might be good to do after such a move.  

How do we go about proposing such a move?

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: Henning Schmiedehausen [mailto:hps@intermeta.de] 
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 12:41 AM
To: turbine-jcs-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: [Fwd: ReOrg of the Turbine CVS repositories]

Hi, 

you didn't got this mail when I first sent it out, so I resend it. I really would like to
talk to you about a possible promotion of JCS out of the Turbine project.

	Regards
		Henning


-----Forwarded Message-----
From: Henning Schmiedehausen <hps@intermeta.de>
To: turbine-jcs-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Cc: Turbine Development List <turbine-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: ReOrg of the Turbine CVS repositories
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:32:40 +0200

Hi,

on the turbine-dev list, we had a little discussion about the various
jakarta-turbine-* projects. One of these is jakarta-turbine-jcs, which seems to be alive and
well, but no longer connected to the main Turbine project.

There was a discussion on general@jakarta about turbine-jcs which went nowhere. 

I remember from the discussion (actually I cheated. I looked into my mailbox :-) that there
was thinking about moving JCS into jakarta commons, a move that I personally no longer consider
wise, because the current state of commons would suddently pour a host of fellow jakarta developers
with commit rights over JCS.

My question now is: Are you folks feeling comfortable being "hidden"
under the umbrella of Jakarta Turbine or can we (we as in "jakarta-turbine developers outside
jcs")  somehow help you to promote the JCS project into 2nd level status in either Jakarta
or DB? 

It would be nice to reduce the twelve (!) different jakarta-turbine-* CVS repositories back
to a more sane number.

Opinions? Please send me a Cc or keep turbine-dev on the Cc list, because I only browse the
jcs-dev list on eyebrowse.

	Regards
		Henning
-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/
 
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-  fusing to acknowledge
that there might be weaknesses in one's  position - in order to identify them so that they
can be remedied -  is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it  deserves
to be on this list of the top five problems."
                       --Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
                                    Open Source Software Development"


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-jcs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-jcs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-jcs-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-jcs-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message