jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: User manual index is broken
Date Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:18:08 GMT
thanks milamber

On Wednesday, March 18, 2015, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 18 March 2015 at 08:14, Milamber <milamber@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > In waiting a better way to generate the index/prev/next section, I fixed
> > the issue manually and updated the website.
> > Now the numbering and Prev/Next are ok on the website.
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17/03/2015 20:54, sebb wrote:
> >> On 17 March 2015 at 08:57, Felix Schumacher
> >> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >>> Am 17.03.2015 07:50, schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>> There is an issue in documentation.
> >>>> To. reproduce:
> >>>> - Select user manual
> >>>> - Select Real time results
> >>>> - Click prev, you get 404
> >>>
> >>> That is because there is no source page live-statistics.xml. Thus no
> html
> >>> page is generated for it.
> >> If the links are broken they should be fixed.
> >>
> >> There was no problem with the docs for 2.12
> >>
> >> When adding new content, if necessary all links must be updated.
> >>
> >>>> If you select the next chapter (best-practices) , real-time results
> is a
> >>>> phantom.
> >>>
> >>> What do you mean by phantom? The prev-target in best-practices is
> >>> remote-test.html, and thus skips realtime-results.html.
> >>>
> >>> Another thing to notice is, that the upper (low-detail) index is not
> in sync
> >>> with the lower (detailed) index.
> >>>
> >>> I think we should merge those two into one and use css (like the main
> menu)
> >>> to hide details on first side.
> >> Don't know what you mean by that.
> >> I think it's important to have both the top-level overview and the
> >> details available.
> >> If that can be done without duplication, so much the better, but if
> >> not, we'll just have to fix it manually.
> >>
> >>> That way the indices will not get out of sync and we have less manual
> work
> >>> to do.
> >>>
> >>> That will not solve the bookkeeping for the prev, next links, though.
> >> In which case there probably needs to be a test case for it.
> >>
> >>> Regards
> >>>  Felix
> >>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>
> >
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message