jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Schumacher <felix.schumac...@internetallee.de>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1732939 - in /jmeter/trunk: bin/ src/core/org/apache/jmeter/gui/util/ src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/config/gui/ src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/sampler/ xdocs/ xdocs/images/ xdocs/usermanual/
Date Thu, 03 Mar 2016 06:39:22 GMT


Am 2. März 2016 22:52:55 MEZ, schrieb Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>Hi Felix,
>Do we delay this one for 3.1 ?

No. I will give it another try in the next days. I think it can be solved easily.

Felix

>Thanks
>
>On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 29.02.2016 um 20:39 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>
>>> Am 29.02.2016 um 20:36 schrieb fschumacher@apache.org:
>>>
>>>> Author: fschumacher
>>>> Date: Mon Feb 29 19:36:14 2016
>>>> New Revision: 1732939
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732939&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Revert changes made by r1732937
>>>> At least HTTPHC4Impl uses HttpWebDav#isWebdavMethod in a way, that
>is
>>>> incompatible to this change.
>>>>
>>>> Was: HTTP Request : Make Method field editable so that additional
>>>> methods (Webdav) can be added easily
>>>>
>>>> Bugzilla Id: 59083
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>      jmeter/trunk/bin/jmeter.properties
>>>>
>jmeter/trunk/src/core/org/apache/jmeter/gui/util/JLabeledRadioI18N.java
>>>> (props changed)
>>>>
>>>>
>jmeter/trunk/src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/config/gui/UrlConfigGui.java
>>>>
>>>>
>jmeter/trunk/src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/sampler/HTTPHC4Impl.java
>>>>
>>>>
>jmeter/trunk/src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/sampler/HTTPSamplerBase.java
>>>>
>>>>
>jmeter/trunk/src/protocol/http/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/sampler/HttpWebdav.java
>>>>      jmeter/trunk/xdocs/changes.xml
>>>>      jmeter/trunk/xdocs/images/asf-logo.gif   (props changed)
>>>>
>>> I wonder how I got this change in here. Will try to get the orginal
>(new)
>>> logo in again.
>>>
>> Seems the logo wasn't replaced by my revert. Should we delete the
>image?
>> It doesn't seem to be used.
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Felix
>>


Mime
View raw message