jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Milamber <milam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:54:22 GMT

I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.

In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even 
if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.


On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank to the answer
>
> On my side, it's ok too
>
> Antonio
>
> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>
>>     - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>     - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to increase
>>     precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>
>>> Antonio
>>>
>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>> :
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
>>> this
>>>>>> way
>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
am
>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
>>> for
>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>
>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>   Felix
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>> visibility
>>> on
>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues
<
>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new
release of jodd
>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement.
It is supposed
>> to
>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release
process withing 1
>> to
>>> 2
>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7
support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be
fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>


Mime
View raw message