jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GitBox <...@apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] [jmeter] FSchumacher commented on a change in pull request #651: Don't assume we have correct JSON at edit time
Date Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:11:04 GMT

FSchumacher commented on a change in pull request #651:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/651#discussion_r593795217



##########
File path: src/protocol/http/src/main/java/org/apache/jmeter/protocol/http/util/GraphQLRequestParamUtils.java
##########
@@ -79,27 +76,32 @@ public static boolean isGraphQLContentType(final String contentType) {
      * @throws RuntimeException if JSON serialization fails for some reason due to any runtime
environment issues
      */
     public static String toPostBodyString(final GraphQLRequestParams params) {
-        final ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
-        final ObjectNode postBodyJson = mapper.createObjectNode();
-        postBodyJson.set(OPERATION_NAME_FIELD,
-                JsonNodeFactory.instance.textNode(StringUtils.trimToNull(params.getOperationName())));
-
+        final StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();

Review comment:
       Yes, it is probably better to move the logic of generating the JSON to a phase when
the variables are already evaluated. Normally this would be done in the `sample` method. In
the GraphQL Sampler case that means more work, as it is more like a tool to fill a normal
HTTP Sampler.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



Mime
View raw message