karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing Apache Karaf 4.2.0 GA
Date Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:56:58 GMT

I'm glad to hear about 4.2.0.GA!

>From my side - I've committed the changes I planned to pax-web 7.x and 8.x
(master) - some interfaces changed and it could be done at major increase.
Also, latest pax-web snapshots (6.0.10-SNAPSHOT, 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT,
7.0.0-SNAPSHOT and 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) *now* depend on pax-cdi 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
(and partially vice versa - pax-cdi depends on pax-web 6.1.2-SNAPSHOT)
because of some changes related to CDI in (pax-)web environments.

Before Karaf 4.2.0.GA, I'd like to have pax-cdi 1.0.0.GA released (or at
least 1.0.0.RC3) with dependency on pax-web 6.0.10 (without explicit
<features>/<repository> tying to any particular version of pax-web).

best regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

2018-02-19 5:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:

> Hi guys,
> After 4.2.0.M1 & 4.2.0.M2, I think it's time to do the first 4.2.0 GA.
> I have three actions on the way:
> 1. Upgrade to Pax Web 7 with Jetty 9.4 support. I started Pax Web/Jetty
> part on
> a local branch. I hope to have something this week around that. It takes a
> little bit of time because the Jetty API slightly changed (as usual). This
> point
> is a blocker and 4.2.0 needs it. If you think it's worth to have a
> 4.2.0.M3 with
> this update, please let me know.
> 2. Merge karaf-docker feature branch. It's something that we discussed
> days ago.
> I updated and cleanup the code for donation. Not blocker but good to have.
> 3. Merge examples branch. In order to allow users to easily start with
> Karaf,
> François and I are working on a set of examples
> (https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples). The idea is
> to
> include those examples in the Karaf distribution, linked them in the
> developer
> guide. At the end, I would like to add itests using these examples as well,
> allowing us to detect regression. Again not a blocker, but good to have.
> Please,
> let me know what you are thinking about the examples. Some examples are in
> development (take a look in the examples pom.xml for the list of examples).
> Roughly, I would like to cut 4.2.0 in 2 weeks or so.
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message