karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0
Date Thu, 01 Feb 2018 09:05:33 GMT
2018-02-01 10:03 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:

> Thanks for the update buddy.
>
> So, I will do the following today:
>
> - bump master to 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT
> - create a branch 7.0.x based on 6.1.x
> - upgrade to Jetty 9.4 on both master and 7.0.x
>

amen!
+1
thanks for explanation

regards
Grzegorz


> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/01/2018 09:56 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it's been me asking for a bump to 7 for Pax Web when using Jetty 9.4 with
> > full J9 support.
> > I'm not that much involved in it anymore so my idea might be overruled by
> > anyone knowing it better.
> > The point for me to do a Pax Web 7, with Jetty 9.4 is:
> > - jetty 9.4 does have some Major changes, so isn't really minor version
> > compatible anymore
> > - jetty 9.4 is now fully functional on J9, while jetty 9.3 was working
> >
> > To reflect these I requested to use version 7, and initially I thought I
> > would be able to actually push also on the new OSGi R7 stuff.
> > But I have to face it, my day job doesn't give me the freedom anymore to
> > actually work on any open source project right now.
> > The only thing I'm able to to is to watch the mailinglists and sometimes
> > give a hint or two :/
> >
> > So feel free to call the version anything that feels better to you, I
> just
> > don't have the "stakes" at it any longer.
> >
> >
> > regards, Achim
> >
> >
> > 2018-02-01 8:43 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzybek@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> OK, one more thing about pax-web and pax-cdi.
> >>
> >> I tried upgrading some versions in pax-cdi and while weld / pax-cdi
> itself
> >> doesn't have problems working with ASM6 / xbean-asm6-shaded (as weld
> uses
> >> own proxy generator from JBoss classwriter), there's problem with
> >> openwebbeans... 1.x version is CDI 1.2, but uses xbean-asm5-shaded.
> >> Openwebbeans 2.x uses xbean-asm6-shaded BUT it's CDI 2.0
> implementation...
> >>
> >> I don't have good solution here. pax-web 6.x already uses asm6 which
> seems
> >> to be backward (down to JDK8) compatible... I don't think dropping
> >> Openwebbeans 1.x support in pax-cdi 1.0.0 is good idea...
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>
> >> 2018-02-01 8:16 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzybek@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Good idea. pax-web 7 won't differ much from 6.1, but it's ok.
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>>
> >>> 2018-02-01 8:04 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:
> >>>
> >>>> My concern is more about the Jetty 9.4 update.
> >>>>
> >>>> In that case, I would propose:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Bump master to Pax Web 8.0.x
> >>>> 2. Create a branch Pax Web 7.0.x based on 6.x
> >>>> 3. Upgrade to Jetty 9.4 in both master and 7.0.x branch.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> JB
> >>>>
> >>>> On 02/01/2018 08:01 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> >>>>> pax-web 7 (master branch) is now using jetty 9.3.21.v20170918.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Actually I'm not trying to tie pax-web releases to JavaEE releases.
I
> >>>> see
> >>>>> that master branch (7.0.0-SNAPSHOT) now uses some OSGi R7 JAX-RS
> >>>>> samples/whiteboard and I don't think it's production-ready yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In other words - I don't think we should have Karaf 4.2 using pax-web
> >>>> 7.0.0
> >>>>> due to this OSGi R7 stuff.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, pax-web 6 already uses ASM6, so it should be (probably) Java9
> >>>> ready.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards
> >>>>> Grzegorz
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2018-02-01 7:57 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino <ancosen1985@yahoo.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Wasn't Pax-web 7 the version with Jetty 9.4.x support?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Andrea Cosentino
> >>>>>> ----------------------------------
> >>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member
> >>>>>> Apache Karaf Committer
> >>>>>> Apache Servicemix PMC Member
> >>>>>> Email: ancosen1985@yahoo.com
> >>>>>> Twitter: @oscerd2
> >>>>>> Github: oscerd
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thursday, February 1, 2018, 7:53:49 AM GMT+1, Grzegorz Grzybek
<
> >>>>>> gr.grzybek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On PAX-WEB side (and wrt PAX-CDI), I did some important, but
> >>>> norrow-scoped
> >>>>>> changes related to pax-cdi integration. Generally pax-web-jetty
now
> >>>> allows
> >>>>>> to run JSF/CDI WARs without problems (at least MyFaces + Weld).
> There
> >>>> was
> >>>>>> minor change needed in pax-web itself and a bit bigger change
in
> >>>> pax-cdi.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I know pax-cdi is not that popular, but still - having 1.0.0.RCx
for
> >> ~5
> >>>>>> years now isn't nice ;)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As for pax-web 6.1.x upgrade to Jetty 9.4 - I'm OK, as (after
I
> think
> >>>> I've
> >>>>>> collected the right information here
> >>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TB_q5r9i8DOIHmBQa1_
> >>>>>> RjsrcjWCwCwsLPj3Pc6FoTJ8/edit#gid=1455909167>
> >>>>>> - see both sheets) Jetty 9.4.x is still Servlets 3.1/JavaEE
7.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> best regards
> >>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2018-01-31 20:59 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> a quick update on the release schedule.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As you probably saw, I canceled the Decanter 2.0.0 vote
today. I
> >> will
> >>>> fix
> >>>>>>> the two pending issues: I should be able to submit a new
2.0.0
> >>>> release to
> >>>>>>> vote tomorrow.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For Cellar releases, I need more time as some changes are
wider
> than
> >>>>>>> expected.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regarding "container", before 4.2.0 release (still planned
in
> couple
> >>>> of
> >>>>>>> weeks), I would like to prepare a 4.1.5 release pretty soon
> >> (probably
> >>>> for
> >>>>>>> the weekend). We did good fixes and improvements valuable
for
> users,
> >>>> so
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>> makes sense to cut a release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 24/01/2018 15:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Just a quick update about the coming releases.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1. Apache Karaf Decanter 2.0.0
> >>>>>>>> I'm working right now on the Decanter 2.0.0 release.
It's a major
> >> new
> >>>>>>>> releases
> >>>>>>>> (from the new Decanter 2.x series). We are on the right
track for
> >>>> this
> >>>>>>>> release,
> >>>>>>>> I should be able to submit to vote during the weekend.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2. Karaf Cellar 4.0.4/4.1.2
> >>>>>>>> Some PRs have been merged and I'm reviewing a larger
PR. I also
> >> have
> >>>>>>>> several
> >>>>>>>> fixes and little improvements on the way. I plan to
submit
> releases
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>> vote in
> >>>>>>>> roughly 2 weeks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 3. Karaf "Container" 4.2.0
> >>>>>>>> After 4.2.0.M1 and 4.2.0.M2, I think we are pretty close
to 4.2.0
> >>>>>>>> release. We
> >>>>>>>> still have 18 issues to qualify and eventually fix for
this
> >> release.
> >>>> One
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>> important one is that we have to upgrade to Pax Web
6.1.2 that
> >> should
> >>>>>>>> upgrade to
> >>>>>>>> Jetty 9.4.6. It's important to be aligned with latest
Camel
> >> releases.
> >>>>>>>> So, I started the Jira triage and also started the Pax
Web Jetty
> >>>>>> ugprade.
> >>>>>>>> I don't have strong dates in mind for now but hopefully,
we should
> >> be
> >>>>>>>> able to
> >>>>>>>> cut 4.2.0 in roughly 2 weeks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message